The tag implication #44167 parallel_sex -> group has been approved.

Reason: It involves at least four characters.

See also: topic #23812

EDIT: The tag implication parallel_sex -> group (forum #333301) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

monsterbomb10010 said:
See also: topic #23812

And as I said in that one (which hasn't gone anywhere since I necro'd it), where tentacles to be involved I hesitate to call it a group
post #926109
Group is only tagged in this one because of the peeper in the back

glyme said:
And as I said in that one (which hasn't gone anywhere since I necro'd it), where tentacles to be involved I hesitate to call it a group
post #926109
Group is only tagged in this one because of the peeper in the back

To me, this post can't be tagged with parallel_sex. Tentacles don't count as characters, and the two females might be fucked by the same unseen tentacle monster.

It definitely makes sense. However, considering how easy it is to tag solo/duo/group and its high encouragement with the default "upload post" UI, it doesn't seem like a make-or-break implication or anything.

Unless I'm missing something--there isn't stuff tagged with parallel_sex, but NOT group, is there?

I think this should prrrrobably be valid.

However I'm not sure how to retag these two images. Not as parallel_sex since one is after_sex and one is ambiguous whether it's sex or masturbation, but does anyone know what they should be tagged as?
post #4732625 post #4687305

The tag implication parallel_sex -> group (forum #333301) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.