This topic is locked.
DragonRanger said:
Why is this intentional?
It shouldn't be, I specifically made borders hidden because they were ugly.
tony311 said:
It shouldn't be, I specifically made borders hidden because they were ugly.
I figured as much, but someone edited my original post claiming that the border color being brought back was intentional, but didn't elaborate.
ippiki_ookami said:
Bug: cannot vote on flagged imagesExpected behavior: you should be able to
Actual behavior: i spill ketchup on my shirt
Steps to duplicate: take a spiritual journey with the buffalo
On that note, every other post's vote up/down buttons are missing and on a severed note, avatars are missing until I reload.
Issue: Child posts flagged for deletion seem to have a yellow thumbnail border instead of a red thumbnail border
Expected behavior: Some indication that the image is flagged for deletion
Actual behavior: Image only appears to be child post
Yeah.
Rainbow_Slash said:
On that note, every other post's vote up/down buttons are missing and on a severed note, avatars are missing until I reload.
links
Aurali said:
links
It's random. Same posts are inconsistent. Avatars not showing up happens most often in forums with high page numbers.
Rainbow_Slash said:
It's random. Same posts are inconsistent. Avatars not showing up happens most often in forums with high page numbers.
I can't duplicate at all, think it might be you :(
Aurali said:
I can't duplicate at all, think it might be you :(
It probably is. I usually don't experience any of the same bugs that are posted here.
Bug: cannot blip or comment
steps taken: attempt blip or comment
resolution: removed failed "preview" fix from live system
That was a fun two hours Tony >.>
Bug: While checking me some CSS errors (yes is that CSS) I encountered this on Opera's Error Console:
Linked-in stylesheet
Invalid value for property: box-shadow
Line 95:
box-shadow:0;
----------^
Linked-in stylesheet
Declaration syntax error
Line 596:
.code { border:1px dashed #aaf; padding:1em 1em;11 overflow:hidden; font-family:
----------------------------------------------^
Expected behavior: box-shadow:0; should be box-shadow: 0px;. And what is that 11 before overflow?
Actuial behavior: I think this has to do with square shadows on radio buttons.
Steps to duplicate: On any post, click Edit, and look on the Rating radio buttons, They have square shadows
Note: Sorry if someone saw just the error boxes, accidentally clicked on "Post"
xLuna said:
Expected behavior: box-shadow:0; should be box-shadow: 0px;.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-CSS1-20080411/#units
"After a '0' number, the unit identifier is optional."
xLuna said:
Bug: While checking me some CSS errors (yes is that CSS) I encountered this on Opera's Error Console:► (31/05/2012 6:04:53 Pm) CSS - http://e621.net/stylesheets/default-min.css?1336683439▼ (31/05/2012 6:04:53 Pm) CSS - http://e621.net/stylesheets/default-min.css?1336683439Linked-in stylesheet
Invalid value for property: box-shadow
Line 95:
box-shadow:0;
----------^► (31/05/2012 6:04:53 Pm) CSS - http://e621.net/stylesheets/default-min.css?1336683439▼ (31/05/2012 6:04:53 Pm) CSS - http://e621.net/stylesheets/default-min.css?1336683439Linked-in stylesheet
Declaration syntax error
Line 596:
.code { border:1px dashed #aaf; padding:1em 1em;11 overflow:hidden; font-family:
----------------------------------------------^Expected behavior: box-shadow:0; should be box-shadow: 0px;. And what is that 11 before overflow?
Actuial behavior: I think this has to do with square shadows on radio buttons.
Steps to duplicate: On any post, click Edit, and look on the Rating radio buttons, They have square shadowsNote: Sorry if someone saw just the error boxes, accidentally clicked on "Post"
Thanks, fixed! The first one is indeed the reason radio inputs still had shadows, and the second one didn't actually affect anything because the overflow isn't doing anything anyway.
Adrian_Blazevic said:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-CSS1-20080411/#units"After a '0' number, the unit identifier is optional."
It's the standard, but Opera (and possibly other browsers) don't recognize it correctly and require 'none'.
Bug: If a username is too large, it might get "mixed" with the comment.
Expected behavior: Eh
Actual behavior: Large name + Comment = last letters of the name inside the comment.
Steps to duplicate: I only seen this one once too, I was randomly browsing images, then I came up to this one:
http://www.e621.net/post/show/105088/absorption_vore-anal_vore-balls-cock_vore-cum-eeve
Check "RunningWithTheWolves" comment, see his name gets mixed with his comment.
Fixed
Bug: Really old forums are bumping/being bumped but show no new post
Expected behavior: If a thread dies it should stay buried.
Actual behavior: Threads are coming back from the dead as zombies
Steps to duplicate: Find a dead forum and look at the date of the last post.
Side note: Either something isn't showing the right value or someone is necroing threads and then deleting their post. It says last updated 17 minutes ago in the index and last updated 3 years ago in the actual thread
Rainbow_Slash said:
Bug: Really old forums are bumping/being bumped but show no new postExpected behavior: If a thread dies it should stay buried.
Actual behavior: Threads are coming back from the dead as zombies
Steps to duplicate: Find a dead forum and look at the date of the last post.
Side note: Either something isn't showing the right value or someone is necroing threads and then deleting their post. It says last updated 17 minutes ago in the index and last updated 3 years ago in the actual thread
Someone's deleting their old forum posts. Doing that bumps the topic. http://e621.net/mod_action
Riversyde said:
Someone's deleting their old forum posts. Doing that bumps the topic. http://e621.net/mod_action
Thought so. Thanks.
Fixed
Bug: [code] blocks do not preserve indentation of lines.
Expected behavior: [code] blocks should preserve indentation of lines to preserve readability.
Actual behavior: Each line of code in a [code] block has whitespace removed from the front of it.
Steps to duplicate: An example can be seen here.
It looks like we switch to a fixed-width font in code blocks, any chance of getting a <pre> tag added into the HTML for code blocks, so browsers will automatically preserve indentation?
Also, I notice that the whitespace at the beginning of the first line of each code block was completely trimmed out, but the remaining whitespace at the beginning of each line after the first was left in the HTML. So asides from the first line, it's just a matter of the browser refusing to render the whitespace (Firefox 12.0, not sure about others but my own past experience in web development is that this is common behavior).
Not A Bug
Bug: Pending Posts are Squished Towards the Left
Expected Behavior: Post Should Be Positioned Like Other, Approved Posts.
Actual Behavior: The whole page breaks
Side Notes: Unsure if this is a browser bug or a bug with e621 itself. I am using Chromium v21.0.1155.2 under Arch Linux x86_64. Clearing my cache and using the --disable-extensions flag did not affect the issue.
Screenshots Of Issue:
Broken, Pending Post: http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/5341/screenshot2012060316591.png
Same Post Working, Now Approved: http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/8319/screenshot2012060317233.png
Yep. It was a browser Bug. Fixed with chromium 21.0.1163.0.
DarkSniper said:
Bug: Pending Posts are Squished Towards the LeftExpected Behavior: Post Should Be Positioned Like Other, Approved Posts.
Actual Behavior: The whole page breaks
Side Notes: Unsure if this is a browser bug or a bug with e621 itself. I am using Chromium v21.0.1155.2 under Arch Linux x86_64. Clearing my cache and using the --disable-extensions flag did not affect the issue.
Screenshots Of Issue:
Broken, Pending Post: http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/5341/screenshot2012060316591.png
Same Post Working, Now Approved: http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/8319/screenshot2012060317233.png
I think it's a browser thing, since I've seen several pending posts without problems.
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/534/shot20120603t181740.png
xLuna said:
I think it's a browser thing, since I've seen several pending posts without problems.
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/534/shot20120603t181740.png
Indeed, I just got a chance to download the stable channel package (19.0.1084.52) and the issue is gone, so it must be a bug affecting the Chromium version I'm using. Looks like I have to deal with it until the next dev build release, which hopefully has a fix for whatever's causing this weird rendering glitch.
DarkSniper said:
Indeed, I just got a chance to download the stable channel package (19.0.1084.52) and the issue is gone, so it must be a bug affecting the Chromium version I'm using. Looks like I have to deal with it until the next dev build release, which hopefully has a fix for whatever's causing this weird rendering glitch.
make a note of this, because I will tell you now we won't support beta browsers ;)
Aurali said:
make a note of this, because I will tell you now we won't support beta browsers ;)
That's undersandable, since betas have bugs
xLuna said:
I think it's a browser thing, since I've seen several pending posts without problems.
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/534/shot20120603t181740.png
only an issue with the dev. release of chrome I must assume since I've been using the beta a few years now and I don't see this problem.
Bug: Blacklist not working for avatars
Expected behavior: Blacklisted images blocked/covered with white/grey Blacklist.. thingy.
Actual behavior: Can see the image in its full glory.
Steps to duplicate: I'm not sure how to replicate it, but I do have a screenshot! http://i47.tinypic.com/2uqzk1c.jpg
My blacklist terms are scat and hoihoi.
I'm also using Chrome 19.0.1084.52 m, and Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit.
Edit: Better screenshot because I'm dumb.. and paranoid. http://i47.tinypic.com/2ewirvc.jpg
Crystalinn said:
Bug: Blacklist not working for avatarsExpected behavior: Blacklisted images blocked/covered with white/grey Blacklist.. thingy.
Actual behavior: Can see the image in its full glory.
Steps to duplicate: I'm not sure how to replicate it, but I do have a screenshot! http://i47.tinypic.com/2uqzk1c.jpg
My blacklist terms are scat and hoihoi.
I'm also using Chrome 19.0.1084.52 m, and Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit.
Edit: Better screenshot because I'm dumb.. and paranoid. http://i47.tinypic.com/2ewirvc.jpg
There's a checkbox in your settings to apply the blacklist to avatars.
null0010 said:
There's a checkbox in your settings to apply the blacklist to avatars.
Oh, alright. Thanks!
Server doesn't like me. :(
Actually, I don't know if it's just me (no one has reported thus AFAIK) but I occasionally get a 500 Server Error. The site WILL LOAD if I refresh, but sometimes it takes multiple refreshes. Not sure what is causing this as it's a sporadic issue.
I just had this problem a few minutes ago though.
Fix Pending
► User blacklist doesn't work for users with capital letters in their name▼ User blacklist doesn't work for users with capital letters in their nameBug: Blacklisting a username that contains capital letters doesn't seem to work
Expected behavior: Being effective regardless of case
Steps to duplicate: Blacklist any name (user:*) that contains capital letters, such as user:Aurali , user:Char etc.
N.B. With the exception of A-Z, other alphanumeric/printable code ( a-z, 0-9, !/@/# etc.) still works. Not sure about non-Latin scripts (あ,ア,б, 阿 etc.)
It works!Thanks for the fix
Using capital letters or common doesn't seem to make a difference with respect to functioning properly
Bug: SSL doesn't seem to work on user home pages (http://e621.net/user/show/xxxx)
Expected behavior: SSL everywhere
Actual behavior: SSL available everywhere but user home pages
Steps to duplicate: Visit any user home page
e.g. https://e621.net/user/show/41009
fix pending
-
tony311 said:
It's the standard, but Opera (and possibly other browsers) don't recognize it correctly and require 'none'.
Oh, didn't know that
ippiki ookami
Admin11 months ago
Bug: cannot vote on flagged images
Expected behavior: you should be able to
Actual behavior: i spill ketchup on my shirt
Steps to duplicate: take a spiritual journey with the buffalo