News - May 23, 2013 (1 day ago)

Hey guys, regardless of what you may have seen proposed in the News recently, our Tag What You See rule is still unchanged from this here. Remember, the only recent change was to allow using external information for tagging character NAMES only, NOT gender or virtually anything else. PLEASE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE RULE! Thanks! :)

X
Lyokira
Privileged
1 year ago
lugia nintendo oze pokémon reaction_image solo unimpressed video_games rating:Safe score:16 user:Lyokira

Tag Implication: iphone -> smartphone -> cellphone -> telephone

In category: Tags and Wiki

Implicating iphone -> smartphone -> cellphone -> telephone.

Reason: iPhones are smartphones are cellphones are telephones, in that order.

EDIT: Me is dofus.

Riversyde
Contributor
1 year ago

Seems awfully convoluted to use all these tags.
Implicating iphone to phone would be sufficient, I would imagine.

Snowy
Privileged
1 year ago
ambiguous_gender annoyed cute dragon grumpy helvetica_(artist) rar scalie scowl solo wings rating:Safe score:6 user:Anomynous

Implicate iphone to smartphone, and smartphone to cellphone. The cellphone -> phone implication already exists.

Or if you don't like the smartphone tag, alias it to cellphone and imply iphone to cellphone. I like the first solution more, but I've always favored more tags rather than fewer. Either way, an image with an iphone should definitely contain the cellphone tag.


I kinda like the idea of aliasing smartphone to cellphone personally.

Lyokira
Privileged
1 year ago
lugia nintendo oze pokémon reaction_image solo unimpressed video_games rating:Safe score:16 user:Lyokira

I'd complain of necro-bump, but eh. Almost forgot about this post. :p

The issue with aliasing iphone and smartphones away, is that iphones are by itself iconic (basically for smartphones, it's iphone, or non-iphone), and smartphones look VERY different from traditional cellphones. (remember those bricks?)

Riversyde
Contributor
1 year ago

Lyokira said:
I'd complain of necro-bump, but eh. Almost forgot about this post. :p

The issue with aliasing iphone and smartphones away, is that iphones are by itself iconic (basically for smartphones, it's iphone, or non-iphone), and smartphones look VERY different from traditional cellphones. (remember those bricks?)

No-one said anything about aliasing iphone away.
But I do favour the idea of aliasing smartphone to cellphone.
After all, they are both mobile phones.

Riversyde
Contributor
1 year ago

smartphone -> cellphone alias and iphone -> cellphone implication done.