Topic: [APPROVED] Add pokemon_(species) to PLA pokemon

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

plsignore

Member

The bulk update request #2040 is active.

create implication sneasler (744) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
create implication kleavor (11) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
create implication ursaluna (173) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
create implication enamorus (34) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
create implication enamorus (34) -> legendary_pokémon (0)
create implication enamorus_(therian_form) (5) -> enamorus (34)
create implication enamorus_(incarnate_form) (28) -> enamorus (34)

Reason: Some of the new pokemon introduced are missing these implications

EDIT: The bulk update request #2040 (forum #327711) has been approved by @NotMeNotYou.

Updated by auto moderator

wat8548

Member

In the time this BUR has been sitting unapproved, three new species for an as yet unreleased game have had their implications set up. Admins pls.

Note that this is incomplete - the rest of the species are in topic #32902. Also, sneasler from this BUR and hisuian_growlithe from the other one have since had implications defined manually by the admins, don't know if that matters or not.

Dickshoe

Member

I guess if there's not enough people jacking off to you the mods/admins don't care to approve your implications.

  • 1