The tag alias #69536 feminist -> feminism is pending approval.

Reason: Not sure why these are separate. I mean, I get that technically "feminist" refers to the person themselves, but if an image visibly depicts someone as a feminist, it's depicting feminism, so it should probably just be tagged with the broader concept.

Honestly I thought the rationale I thought I was going to see here would be the standard 'What a character is saying usually isn't enough to identify them unambiguously as an X, but the claims the character is making can be reasonably identified as being of X type'

There are a few taggings of these currently where it's not obvious to me why the tag should apply (eg. there is no dialogue or text)

savageorange said:
Honestly I thought the rationale I thought I was going to see here would be the standard 'What a character is saying usually isn't enough to identify them unambiguously as an X, but the claims the character is making can be reasonably identified as being of X type'

There are a few taggings of these currently where it's not obvious to me why the tag should apply (eg. there is no dialogue or text)

There's a couple mistags I've been cleaning up. Most of the non-textual examples in feminist right now feature the feminism symbol, a venus sign with a fist.

post #2739834

Here it's on the white dog's patch.