News - May 23, 2013 (2 days ago)

Hey guys, regardless of what you may have seen proposed in the News recently, our Tag What You See rule is still unchanged from this here. Remember, the only recent change was to allow using external information for tagging character NAMES only, NOT gender or virtually anything else. PLEASE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE RULE! Thanks! :)

X
e621 amazing ambiguous_gender animal_ears balance brown_eyes building cat city collar crazy_ivory feline feral fur glass house light lights looking_at_viewer maine_coon meme monorailcat night pink_nose real sky solo street tower window
 

Edit | Respond | Download

Before commenting, read the how to comment guide.

5 comments below threshold.

I thought some of you may like this :3

Cute, but D: I hope he doesn't fall

Monorailcat!!

jaspertjie said:
0/10

? whats wrong with you are oyu more of a dog person?

MartyFreeman said:
Cute, but D: I hope he doesn't fall

I think its a she *note pink collar* and same

Duster said:
Monorailcat!!

lol how did i miss that XD

He/she'll be fine. They're on the second/third floor of a building on top of a mountain.

Arcanine09 said:
He/she'll be fine. They're on the second/third floor of a building on top of a mountain.

You dont know where this place is....do you?

Renabu said:
Funny thing is this isn't a photo, but actual art. Kinda threw me off when I first saw it.

its a photo not a drawing

Conker said:
I thought some of you may like this :3

I like this.
Also, I have JUST ran onto this picture somewhere on the Net

Vyss said:
I like this.
Also, I have JUST ran onto this picture somewhere on the Net

good to know :3

Duster said:
Monorailcat!!

WOO WOO!

Its a good picture and a beautiful cat.

SimperinFool said:
Even if the cat did fall, as long as it's falling from really high it will be fine.

Cats have such a low terminal velocity that as long as they land right-side up they won't be hurt. So the higher the cats falls from, the more chance it has to orient itself to land safely.

if they fall 4meter+ even cats can have broken legs.

Vyss said:
I have JUST ran onto this picture somewhere on the Net

I had it as a wallpaper a while back...

also, found the source.

thats a cute pussy

Have to add the Maine_coon tag, my favorite kitty :)

Renabu said:
Funny thing is this isn't a photo, but actual art. Kinda threw me off when I first saw it.

Note the digitization in it as opposed to grain. This is digital photo and an example of why film cameras are better than digital cameras. This is coming from a photographer who knows digital is only better for its convenience.

Hobbes said:
Note the digitization in it as opposed to grain. This is digital photo and an example of why film cameras are better than digital cameras. This is coming from a photographer who knows digital is only better for its convenience.

pff... you're flatly wrong. my digital camera can make 11x14 prints without seeing "digitization". what you're seeing in this picture is the CCD compensating for low light levels.

for a film camera to work for this same shot you'd either need an inordinately long exposure time (to catch the low light details of the city) which would almost certainly blow out the highlights of the cat - not to mention the thing moving while you try to set up the tripod to avoid blurring... OR you would need inordinately high ISO film, which would throw an unseemly amount of grain into the picture.

i good quality modern digital camera is as good as a film camera in almost every situation, and better than a film camera in most. what you refer to as "convenience" is actually the difference of being able to get a shot and not. is it "convenient" to be able to adjust the ISO on the fly, or is it a tool that makes you more likely to be able to get a picture that you would otherwise miss?

i've done studio and action photography for years, and STILL have a minolta t-101 among modern film, and a good digital. digital wins hands down.

i remember years spent in the lab and STILL love the craft of mechanical photography, but digital is far FAR better.

My Powershot S3IS always tossed grain into digital shots, while my SLR never has any. So quality/price is a deciding factor on that.^

My dad still prefers his Canon A1(not AE) SLR and I prefer my Rebel SLR.

Jaxinc said:
My Powershot S3IS always tossed grain into digital shots, while my SLR never has any. So quality/price is a deciding factor on that.^

My dad still prefers his Canon A1(not AE) SLR and I prefer my Rebel SLR.

my current favorite is still my little old cannon g9. i can do almost any of the shots most people would use a SLR for... except long shots... without the extra size and weight.

if you're seeing grain you probably need a longer exposure :(

another way to limit grain is through exposure bracketing. i often see grain start to show up when i have too broad a spread of light levels, or color saturation. if your camera can do exposure bracketing you essentially will take several pictures and combine them later on a computer. some people use it for HDR stuff, but you can also get more subtle results :)

There's a fine line between brave and crazy, and that line is cat.

cats are badass

cat got skills
Ninja Pro got nothing on this kitty!

I saw this picture on an article about "Cat physic" on a magazine before ^^

Didnt expect to see this here

SimperinFool said:
Even if the cat did fall, as long as it's falling from really high it will be fine.

So, if it falls two feet, it's fucked? Bizzaro world.

Hobbes said:
Note the digitization in it as opposed to grain. This is digital photo and an example of why film cameras are better than digital cameras. This is coming from a photographer who knows digital is only better for its convenience.

blah blah, nostalgia, blah blah. make stuff up blah blah. everyone might as well just use hammer and chisels technology ruined everything blah blah.