This image is displayed at 67% of its original size. View original
Image samples have been disabled. If you find this to be too slow, you can turn samples back on in your profile settings.
Search (Search Help)
Tags
- ? 2012 20131
- ? all fours 5234
- ? black hair 8642
- ? black lips 231
- ? black nose 5162
- ? blonde hair 13587
- ? blue eyes 30909
- ? breasts 99088
- ? canine 78114
- ? claws 19332
- ? cum 48427
- ? cum inside 17898
- ? digitigrade 4570
- ? doggy position 3111
- ? ear piercing 10730
- ? eye contact 3206
- ? eyewear 15544
- ? female 179645
- ? fleki (character) 66
- ? from behind 12280
- ? fur 8293
- ? glasses 10499
- ? grey body 352
- ? grey fur 4286
- ? hair 78909
- ? licking 10791
- ? looking at partner 63
- ? male 144774
- ? nude 83233
- ? pawpads 3749
- ? penetration 40194
- ? penis 88598
- ? piercing 20561
- ? plain background 40906
- ? pussy juice 8329
- ? raised tail 9481
- ? sex 54026
- ? shinigamigirl 242
- ? short hair 7508
- ? side boob 5550
- ? side view 310
- ? simple background 3645
- ? straight 35472
- ? teeth 8303
- ? tongue 34582
- ? tongue out 10890
- ? vaginal 25390
- ? vaginal penetration 19124
- ? white background 27685
- ? wolf 20884
- ? wolfy-nail (character) 40
- ? yellow eyes 8603
Statistics
- ID: 225203
- Posted: 10 months ago by tony311
- Size: 1200x701 (179.7 KB)
- Source: furaffinity.net/user/shinigamigirl
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 39
Before commenting, read the how to comment guide.
ippiki ookami
Admin10 months ago
nottelling999
Blocked10 months ago
-.-
Roy
Member10 months ago
As we are all aware that statements like "nobody", "everybody", "never" and "always" are at most asymptotically true, it needs little mention that in the set of all human beings exist more than zero entities that do no qualify for the condition mentioned. Yet in common usage "approximately nobody" is sufficient to regard the condition to be fulfilled regardless.
Having established that, Ippiki never specifically included theirself. I, for example, indeed don't particularly care about who watches or unwatches. I care about nitpicks that fail due to a limited POV.
You lose. Don't pick nits when you don't know what you're doing.
Josee
Member10 months ago
Jaxinc
Member10 months ago
I'll never understand the need to unwatch an artist over a single piece...
Kiparis
Member10 months ago
Because dumb whining.
"Baaw, artist no cater entirely to my taste!"