Interpret it however you like, but I know for a fact that this is no horse cock. :D

Actini said:
You're the artist?

No, I commissioned this piece.

Actini said:
So what is it?
And why's it look like horsedick?

You only see a small part of it. Yes, it's big. But it's essentially just a really, really oversized cat dick. I suggest you take a look at this piece to make sure you know what I mean. http://www.furaffinity.net/view/5800274/

Actini said:
Smarmy one, ain'cha? Well, I can smarm right back.
I suggest you take a look at this wiki to make sure you know what E621 means. https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=tag_what_you_see

No worries, I know about the Tag What You See rule. Thing is, I don't see a horse penis here. And neither should you, really. I dare say they do look rather different and unique. What I see is a rather big penis with no further special features. You're clearly interpreting here, and since that are violating the rule you just linked.

Actini said:
Oh, no you did not just pull that shit with me.
Why the hell are you arguing so lividly over this, and forcing me to stare at a dick of any kind?
The hell is wrong with you?
Fine, I'll play your game then - you see that rib?
The general 'tube' shape of it? That's a horse cock.

Now stop goddamn arguing about something stupid so I can stop looking at this. It makes me uncomfortable.

I'm merely continuing what you started. You asked questions that I answered. I don't see anything wrong with this at all.
If you're uncomfortable with it, then why start this discussion in the first place? That makes little sense.
So don't make me link cat penises. Or that of fossas, etc. It would appear you have little idea how similar penises can look. And since this one is by no means realistically sized, I'd be careful stating that one thing you see about it makes it belong to a specific species. Again, this would be interpreting since all you can see is some part of it.