Rhiorrha said:
Good face...but I can't stand images like this: super-weak 12-year old human girl body (with huge tits, of course), when tigers are the Arnold Schwarzenegger equivalent of the cat family.

wtf are you smoking? her thighs are bigger around than her skull, and her hips are FAR wider than her shoulders. i don't know if you've ever hung around with kids, but 12 year olds tend to be rather like bean-poles. all lank and no flank.

fit women rarely have big "guns" if you're referring to her arms? i don't even know what to make of your post. her ta-tas are smaller than her head, which in cartoons is at least trying to not be freaky.

mosh_grizzly said:
...your description of minors frightens me.

hmm? you're alarmed by me describing children as lanky? if you're the one somehow implying any kind of sexual intonation to "lanky bean poles", that's all you buddy :) from ages 9 to 15ish kids all all lank. that's when the long bones really get in gear and it takes a few more years for the rest of the anatomy to catch up and the physique to fill out to more adult proportions. hence my reference of "no flank"

Arcanine09 said:
We forgot we were kids before? And how lanky we were too? Wowgee. D: I remember, at least, how freaking thin I was when I was young. And I agree with Jason, you just don't remember, or were never around other kids or really didn't give two shits ~.~

ha! i was 6'4 and around 190lbs at 16. talk about lanky. now, at 30, i'm 6'6 and 240 and STILL feel like a bean pole.