kamimatsu said:
Thats like saying earth is porn because every generation in your family tree fucked at least once

No it's not. I don't agree that e621 is porn. I was saying that saying that it is not porn is ALSO, by any reasonable definition, wrong. That's pretty much what I already said, so good job not reading my blip, I guess.

This isn't that subtle a distinction: both the definitely affirmative and the definitely negative statement are quite clearly wrong. Perfectly normal in a fuzzy domain like linguistics.