Show Search Options
In response to blip #126644

macsionnaigh said:
あれぇ~?Mairoニキが豪遊兄貴のポケモン淫夢4章旧作の絵転載し始めましたよ。やっぱ好きなんすね~
じゃあ削除したNYNブイズのバトルクッキー☆動画も返してくれよ~頼むよ~

Mairoさんが淫夢の事を知らないのは間違いない。

あれぇ~?Mairoニキが豪遊兄貴のポケモン淫夢4章旧作の絵転載し始めましたよ。やっぱ好きなんすね~
じゃあ削除したNYNブイズのバトルクッキー☆動画も返してくれよ~頼むよ~

In response to blip #126636

jestheproto said:
Why are they all just "illegal protogen" what does that even mean [crying emoji]

I don't like using that term, but I do know what it means. It's when a protogen's design goes against the official guidelines for the species (there's a summary on the wiki ).
Well there are three ways to go against the guidelines, if the design has a trait that is forbidden or restricted, then it is illegal; if it has a trait that is not on the list, it's unofficial; if it lacks a trait that is required, it's not a protogen but something protogen-like, if you call that a protogen, it's illegeal*
*.-the last paragraph is not as fact based as the first and is just My understanding of things

does anyone remember when I said this? well, I can now say it again with first-hand experience.

I've had fun doing character design in the past, the few times I have done it, but... 'sona design is just different, somehow. I'm not sure if it's just the absolute unrestrained freedom or the fear of branding myself with something I don't totally jive with.

I dunno... I'll probably stumble into some good ideas eventually, but, for now, I just have this notebook page with the word "fish" written on.

In response to blip #126638

@Sunbather: it's especially bad when you got a special case that's you've never even thought of before and aren't sure if it's even taggable, so you just smash the ID: into your blacklist and pray you never see that concept again

atleast it's not as bad as before i had an account: back when you were only allowed SIX (6!!!) whole-ass tags for searching if you didn't have an account, so you had to learn how to do excluding searches and ration out what you wanted to see the least for your impromptu blacklist. i am so happy that they raised the tag search cap for those without an account now, that certianly wasn't fun

also thanks for the post-rock recommendations way back, talk talk is so good, rest in peace Mark Hollis

Is it just me or do you guys hate blacklisting stuff, more specifically individual stuff? Not because it's a hassle, but because you just really want it gone badly.

In response to blip #126632

Daleport996 said:
I scrolled down and more than half of the Related Entries section is just controversies. Also why the hell is Protogen trending on KYM right now? And I didn't even know it has controversies either.

Lmao, I fucking hate being on the internet. I was gonna go to bed early, but now I'm just unreasonably mad.

Why are they all just "illegal protogen" what does that even mean 😭

Finally got my first brand new warhammer 40k miniatures (adeptus mechanicus skitarii) all primer applied now just gotta paint and assemble them which will probably be sunday because of work

In response to blip #126632

Daleport996 said:
I scrolled down and more than half of the Related Entries section is just controversies. Also why the hell is Protogen trending on KYM right now? And I didn't even know it has controversies either.

Lmao, I fucking hate being on the internet. I was gonna go to bed early, but now I'm just unreasonably mad.

Ah sorry for ruining your night

Went on vrc with some friends

There was cock, marriage, and drinking

Cool

In response to blip #126610

in response to the quote comment conundrum:

to put it simply, the program that puts quotes on replies expects reply quotes to not be nested, so when they are the text gets screwed

visual explanation

comment you want to reply to, by user C:

B said:

A said:
text_a

text_b

text_c
[quote]B said:[quote]A said: text_a[/quote]text_b[/quote]text_c

1. you press relply and the program notices it begins with a quote
2. it removes text up to the first [/quote] to keep comments clean:
text_b[/quote]text_c {your reply}
3. it quotes the text:

C said:
text_b

text_c[/quote] {your reply}
[quote]C said: text_b[/quote]text_c[/quote]
4. now it's fucked. C didn't say text_b.

how it should look:

C said:
text_c

{your reply}

in other words, always preview your comments

In response to blip #126608

Daleport996 said:
@Daleport996: No wait, I think I figured out why.

This is how the quotes are structured in my original comment:

[/quote]

` it runs into, leaving this.
[code]
[/quote]

[/quote]

And when the entire comment is quoted, it gets closed when it got to the first [/quote].

[/quote]

I guess the script doesn't actually write in DText to format stuff in the background, so that's why only one [/quote] shows up at the end.

Actually that last [/quote] is removed properly since it's not nested. If there's a [​quote] it removes the next [/quote], but if it comes across another [​quote] before it encounters [/quote] it forgets it had a prior stack

[quote]
[quote][/quote]
[/quote]

     ||
     \/

[/quote]
In response to blip #126607

@Daleport996: No wait, I think I figured out why.

This is how the quotes are structured in my original comment:

[quote]
[quote][/quote]
[/quote]

[quote][/quote]

Then, I guess the script that handles replies removes all instances of [quote], but only removes the first [/quote] it runs into, leaving this.

[/quote]

[/quote]

And when the entire comment is quoted, it gets closed when it got to the first [/quote].

[quote][/quote]

[/quote][/quote]

I guess the script doesn't actually write in DText to format stuff in the background, so that's why only one [/quote] shows up at the end.

In response to blip #126604

It's the first time in 21 years that I play using a video game controller. And it turns out I suck at using the analog stick.

SNPtheCat said:
That's how e6 handles using the reply function on a comment with nested quotes, it does so very poorly (i suspect to discourage quote chains/rp)

Oh yeah, had it happen on one of my posts too.

I suspect when it finds a [quote] it just looks for the next [/quote] and removes everything in between. Ignoring other instances of [/quote]. But I'm not sure why the other quote I made in the same comment after that also broke.

In response to blip #126601

Critical_Stiban said:
Nevermind it’s just comments being weird in one place.

It's because any formatting like ` and [​code] has higher priority compared to [/quote], so if the two don't have their other pair before [/quote], it gets treated as plain text (and so doesn't end the quote)

Oh you're talking about this
That's how e6 handles using the reply function on a comment with nested quotes, it does so very poorly (i suspect to discourage quote chains/rp)

In response to blip #126592

dba_afish said:
yes!

too much of male fashion is seen as the default and "unisex", makes it difficult for women who want to crossdress.

you know what we need to do? what we need to do is make it more taboo for w-women-- to, umm, wear jeans and a t-shirt... so that--

...

I swear that idea sounded better in my head.

LMAO

In response to blip #126592

dba_afish said:
yes!

too much of male fashion is seen as the default and "unisex", makes it difficult for women who want to crossdress.

you know what we need to do? what we need to do is make it more taboo for w-women-- to, umm, wear jeans and a t-shirt... so that--

...

I swear that idea sounded better in my head.

LOL

In response to blip #126590

Nimphia said:
not enough actual crossdressing girls 😞 We need crossdressing equality...

yes!

too much of male fashion is seen as the default and "unisex", makes it difficult for women who want to crossdress.

you know what we need to do? what we need to do is make it more taboo for w-women-- to, umm, wear jeans and a t-shirt... so that--

...

I swear that idea sounded better in my head.

In response to blip #126590

Nimphia said:
crossdressing female solo -comic -sequence -multiple_images -model_sheet

Sad amount of mistagged lore males that are TWYS female and not enough actual crossdressing girls 😞 We need crossdressing equality... Working on both adding more and cleaning up the mistags.

post #4166206 post #4114285 post #4229155

<3

I think I've cleaned it up for now, let's hope it stays clean for a bit... There were a handful of "visibly male character wearing female body suit" images I guess will have to remain as false positives.