TheHuskyK9 said:
I was on the side of invalidation months ago and I still am today. Cute might have a purpose, but peeps have a huge range on what they consider cute and it is mistagged very often. I remember someone put the cute tag on a vore pic because the uploader thought that getting eaten is cute.
This.
Because I have searched couple times using the tag, but majority of the stuff under it right now, I would've never tagged with cute to begin with. Also most of the time when post gets explicit I wouldn't consider things to be that cute anymore.
Main issue is that there is clearly use for tag like this, but there's not many alternatives. At least with armpits it was easy to just use already exsisting tags. chibi is one, but even that is getting misstagged a lot, because it should have clearly defined feature, not just that characters head is slightly larger than it should be. big_eyes kinda works, but also contains tons of sonic and toony characters.
Updated by anonymous