Topic: 'Cute' Tag Discussion

Mario69 said:

Main issue is that there is clearly use for tag like this, but there's not many alternatives. At least with armpits it was easy to just use already exsisting tags. chibi is one, but even that is getting misstagged a lot, because it should have clearly defined feature, not just that characters head is slightly larger than it should be. big_eyes kinda works, but also contains tons of sonic and toony characters.

As I am trying to say, may exist a way of "saving" the tag (and it probably would need this disambiguation to work).

Here it is ...again:

I would suggest reseting the 'cute' tag; in other words: creating a tag with a less common name, then reallocating to it the posts which fit in our standards.
If you look at the 'daww' tag you will notice how impressively harmonic it is, not only proving that is possible to make a good version of the 'cute' tag, but being a possible starting point for the aforementioned reset.

However those "our standards" really would need to be established before.

Updated by anonymous