NotMeNotYou said:
If it's visible that the urine is "used" as part of a fetish it becomes explicit.
In more concrete terms if the process of wetting themselves is the focus, exaggerated, or otherwise given importance it's explicit.

Basically if you look at an image and think "this is made for the fetish" it's explicit.

NotMeNotYou said:
If it's visible that the urine is "used" as part of a fetish it becomes explicit.
In more concrete terms if the process of wetting themselves is the focus, exaggerated, or otherwise given importance it's explicit.

Basically if you look at an image and think "this is made for the fetish" it's explicit.

Alright, so if the focus of an image is omorashi, but there's no actual urine on-screen, then tag as questionable.

If the image's focus is omorashi, and there is urine on-screen, then tag as explicit, regardless of whether a character is fully clothed, naked, and weather there is a single drop of urine on-screen or a yellow version of the Nile River.

If the only urine on-screen is depicted as a bladder meter, then tag as questionable.

If a character is urinating/wetting, but omorashi is not the intended focus of the image, tag as safe/questionable, assuming nothing else "crazy" is happening in the image.

Would you say that this is a solid list of guidelines?