Topic: Naming Living_machines what they are

NotMeNotYou said:
If someone knows what aircraft it is by all means tag it. Just keep it general enough that it can be used more than once, and don't make it too specific. So, if something is an A-10 tag it as such, don't specify A-10_(us_army) or something like that.

The real problem with guns was mainly that people were arguing the exact make and model with all its accessories and then wanted to tag things based off of that. That level of pedantic tagging helps nobody.

I did just mean general tags, and not specifics. Like F-15 would just be F-15, not F-15A, F-15C, F-14F so on. The problem is what collumn should the tags go in. Species? General?

Fenrick said:
Is anyone even considering whether this applies to normal pictures with aircraft? It seems strange to only apply this to one or the other considering that there's a tag to distinguish the two thankfully

It could, I mean, cars get tagged what brand they are, iirc. Like a 1967 Camaro is just, Camaro. Other cars get their general tags too, Charger, Challenger, etc.

So if you see a Boeing 747, tag, Boeing_747, but without the -100, -200, -8, -full, etc

Updated by anonymous