Topic: why does human only get removed

deagaw said:
i mean yeah its not furry...

Welp, you just answered yourself.

Gelbooru deletes stuff that's not japanese (unless you get very special permissions and admins like you) and Paheal deletes stuff that's not pornographic and not rule34 (aka character that's well known by mainstream).

So if our aim is to archive furry artwork, what's the point of expanding into non-furry territory when we are already having severe issues with furry content alone almost daily and the volume of uploads keep rising?

Humanoids are accepted, but not in our focus. If you are uploading humanoids, then be aware of the guidelines and content that's on the line is always subject to deletion.

Dogenzaka said:
Are recently approved humanoid posts subject to deletion if a mod feels like? I uploaded a higher-quality version of a recently approved image and it was deleted for being human only, even though Maleficent is apparently humanoid with at least 2 other existing images of her in her horned human form still up from this year.

If the inferior post is not grandfathered, the decision can be more easily overruled, which I did.
I cannot see any humanoid features in post #1751659 as horns are clearly part of costume which is clearly not directly attached to character as you can see the shadow below it - and the post was 2 months old.

Generally speaking accidental approvals do not justify new uploads. If you feel like post has been mistakenly approved poke approver or head admin about the issue. I usually delete a bunch of stuff once I get dmail of "why was my upload specifically deleted when these five uploads from last year has been approved" and suddenly those five uploads get deleted.

Updated by anonymous