AnotherDay said:
the excuse that this is "furry centrist" and "there are plenty of other sites that also have non-furry content" really doesn't work

That's not an excuse, it's just a fact. e6 is an archive for furry art.

AnotherDay said:
If it's human but has pointy ears, hey! That's an elf. It gets included. That's totally relevant to the website!

Clawdragons said:
Personally, I would be happy if the uploading guidelines were made more strict, and excluded basically-human content like elves and such.

ikdind said:
+1, for whatever that's worth.

Yes the uploading guidelines could use some tightening up.

AnotherDay said:
Allowing human only content would speed up approvals because you'd no longer have people making judgement calls. Overall, it seems like removing the "human filter" would make processing faster and save staff time

It might speed up individual approvals in one respect, but it definitely would not save time overall. The number of posts that need to be reviewed for quality, duplication and DNP status would increase dramatically. And that's already a difficult and thankless job as it is.

AnotherDay said:
Those other sites aren't even half as well run, put together, and objective as this website. This website's standards and tagging system is the best in the industry.

The reason this site is so good is because it has a specific focus. This attracts dedicated users and staff who volunteer their free time to make it great. To echo what SnowWolf said, if e6 started accepting human only art then I would leave.