The current missing_cutie_mark -> cutie_mark alias is kind of like aliasing no_underwear to underwear. I realize missing_cutie_mark probably isn't all that common, but I think removing any possible source of mistagging is worth it.

forum #124211: the consensus was to alias it to invalid_tag, but it never got done.

+1 for invalidating (or possibly an alias to my_little_pony to prevent invalid_tag clutter)

Tuvalu said:
+1 for invalidating (or possibly an alias to my_little_pony to prevent invalid_tag clutter)

If we're for getting rid of the tag, +1 for aliasing to mlp.

engageforth said:
If we're for getting rid of the tag, +1 for aliasing to mlp.

I'm not too sure if aliasing it to mlp is a perfect idea, could it be possible that a cutie mark could appear in an image unrelated to mlp? If not, should cutie_mark also implicate mlp?

Looking at the things aliased to cutie_mark, perhaps this alias was a mistake when cleaning up tags.

Tuvalu said:
I'm not too sure if aliasing it to mlp is a perfect idea, could it be possible that a cutie mark could appear in an image unrelated to mlp? If not, should cutie_mark also implicate mlp?

Looking at the things aliased to cutie_mark, perhaps this alias was a mistake when cleaning up tags.

Well, cutie_mark -mlp has about 100 posts. Some should be tagged with mlp, some are for marks that happen to be at the hip and some (e.g, post #462746) I have NO idea why they have that tag.

Lol. I had no idea it got aliased to cutie_mark.

Yeah. I think moving it to my_little_pony is probably a good solution.

Circeus said:
Well, cutie_mark -mlp has about 100 posts. Some should be tagged with mlp, some are for marks that happen to be at the hip and some (e.g, post #462746) I have NO idea why they have that tag.

TIL it doesn't already implicate mlp.

Edit: Approved moving alias to my_little_pony.

Also approved implication cutie_mark -> my_little_pony