I feel somewhat upset.
I would've rather had my older posts removed, as the majority of them, I think, don't fit the quality standards, as those images being objectively terrible, even to me.
I can also get why Post 994117 was removed (it was objectively terrible, as well as being uploaded with a mindset of pure negativity, so I really didn't give two shits about quality in that post), but I don't get why Post 1004697 was removed, outside of it possibly not having any shading (due to me fearing I'd fuck up lighting.)
I don't need to know why my more decent stuff was taken down while my shit-tier stuff is still up. What I want to know is, what ARE the quality standards of the site. I want to follow them as close to the letter as possible if I can.
Updated