Implicating ori → ori_and_the_blind_forest
Link to implication

Reason:

Ori is the main character of the game.

EDIT: The tag implication ori -> ori_and_the_blind_forest (forum #201522) has been approved by @Millcore.

Reviving since the series is getting some new attention with the release of Ori and the Will of the Wisps. Since it's a series now, would implicating ori to some tag like ori_(series) be better?

strikerman said:
Reviving since the series is getting some new attention with the release of Ori and the Will of the Wisps. Since it's a series now, would implicating ori to some tag like ori_(series) be better?

Ori_(series) sounds better, but should the separate games be aliased or implied?

I'm not that familiar with the series, but I think aliased? Unless there's enough unique characters between the two titles to warrant separate tags

Individual games/books/movies in a series don't tend to get their own tags. Monster Hunter used to have a monster_hunter_world tag for monsters and characters added in that game, but the tag was removed/aliased to the monster_hunter series tag. Similarly, there's many characters in Pokemon that are from a particular game in the series, but they're all kept under the pokemon tag (there is the pokemon_mystery_dungeon tag, but that's its own spinoff series and setting, not a specific game in a series).

strikerman said:
I'm not that familiar with the series, but I think aliased? Unless there's enough unique characters between the two titles to warrant separate tags

99% of the art is focused on Ori, but there's a handful of other characters that occasionally show up alongside Ori (usually Naru, Sein, or Kuro). I haven't played Will of the Wisps yet, but I imagine there's a few from there that will inevitably show up in art, as well. There's also art that uses Ori's species (the guardian_spirits) without featuring Ori themself. Given these things, I don't think an alias is appropriate.

watsit said:
Individual games/books/movies in a series don't tend to get their own tags.

What about the legend of zelda tags?

strikerman said:
What about the legend of zelda tags?

Good question. I mentioned how Monster Hunter had a game-specific tag removed, and Pokemon has avoided entry-specific tags. I don't recall seeing entry-specific tags for How To Train Your Dragon, Digimon, Animal Crossing, or anything of the sort either. I'm not sure why Zelda gets to have specific tags like that.

strikerman said:
I'm not that familiar with the series, but I think aliased? Unless there's enough unique characters between the two titles to warrant separate tags

A few characters from the first game show back up, there's no same-named characters that are actually somebody different.

Ori_(Stargate) is a tag? Not sure if those pasty-looking dudes are furry, but likely scaly? (Joke) :D

alphamule said:
Ori_(Stargate) is a tag? Not sure if those pasty-looking dudes are furry, but likely scaly? (Joke) :D

Aren't the ori living fireballs ?

Also, both Ori games almost have the same characters.

kamril said:
Aren't the ori living fireballs ?

Also, both Ori games almost have the same characters.

Naru, Gumo, and Ori return, Sein and Kuro do not. No new characters use those names, though there is a character named Seir.

Was thinking of the Priors. Derp.

alphamule said:
Was thinking of the Priors. Derp.

Hallowed are the Ori.

The tag implication ori -> ori_and_the_blind_forest (forum #201522) has been approved by @Millcore.