Implicating hook_hand → hook
Link to implication

Reason:

You can't have a hook hand without a hook, right?

EDIT: The tag implication hook_hand -> hook (forum #235797) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

+1. Indeed.

The same applies to 'fish_hook' and 'fishing_hook', also aliasing these two wouldn't be a bad idea (the second is slightly more popular).

Question: should we have a tag for hook poercings? I see them sometimes.

e.g. post #1025742 (nose and tail)

The bulk update request #4924 is active.

create implication fish_hook (792) -> hook (4862)

Reason: it's a type of hook

EDIT: The bulk update request #4924 (forum #366936) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4924 (forum #366936) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The tag implication hook_hand -> hook (forum #235797) has been approved by @gattonero2001.