Aliasing bikini_armor → skimpy_armor
Link to alias

Reason:

Close enough, and the tag name is consistent with skimpy.
Also revealing_armor -> skimpy_armor.

And skimpy_armor could be implicated to unconvincing_armor.

EDIT: The tag alias bikini_armor -> skimpy_armor (forum #216415) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

-1. Bikini armor is a specific type of armor. Skimpy armor can be any type of skimpy armor, including bikini armor. Chainmail_bikini also comes to mind.

BlueDingo said:
-1. Bikini armor is a specific type of armor. Skimpy armor can be any type of skimpy armor, including bikini armor. Chainmail_bikini also comes to mind.

So change it to imply and it works, right?

Alias is better. Keeping all of chainmail_bikini, bikini_armor, skimpy_armor and unconvincing_armor would be redundant, not to mention that three-tiered implication is too much for something that rare.

Genjar said:
Also revealing_armor -> skimpy_armor.

Does this look skimpy to you?

post #742937

And wouldn't it be easier to use the preexisting tag skimpy for armor that is skimpy?

The tag alias bikini_armor -> skimpy_armor (forum #216415) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.