Topic: What fetishes do you find most ridiculous?

Posted under General

(this is a flame war waiting to happen)

Any that, when pressed, will cause the person with the fetish to say "I wouldn't actually do it.".

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
Any that, when pressed, will cause the person with the fetish to say "I wouldn't actually do it.".

y tho

it's not like everyone know eachother here

Updated by anonymous

To me, the idea of someone being attracted to something they don't want makes no sense. Usually, people are attracted to things they do want and repulsed by things they don't want.

Did you change your avatar specifically for this topic?

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
Did you change your avatar specifically for this topic?

tbh I only come to this site when I want to fap to its material, which is like once a week or 2 weeks lately (not very in the mood) but today I felt like making this topic and changing my avatar. Unrelated things, but I can imagine why you ask.

Although I should have made the title more like "fetishes you don't understand" or "don't like at all". I think it would be more accurate and functional.

I'd say my only fetish is interespecies and related things, but besides that, I'm very unfetishistic. I don't even like anal or oral so you can imagine the bunch of fetishes I'm not familiar with.

The one I find the most ridiculous would probably be that one where the sperm literally fills the other being to the point it expands their size. Either that or vore I guess.

Updated by anonymous

Forniphilia or human furniture (Google images) - "a form of bondage and sexual objectification in which a person's body is incorporated into a chair, table, cabinet or other pieces of furniture."

Crush fetish - "one is sexually aroused when someone crushes objects, food, and sometimes small animals (frequently insects) with their body, usually under their foot, or when crushed oneself." Final level: high heel to penis.

This post attempts to illustrate 100 fetishes. If you use your blacklist at all, it will probably be blacklisted, but I consider it quite safe to click on.

post #95277

BlueDingo said:
Any that, when pressed, will cause the person with the fetish to say "I wouldn't actually do it.".

"I fap to gay furry porn but I wouldn't have gay sex" must be a furry trope.

Updated by anonymous

ckgjkjj6 said:
The one I find the most ridiculous would probably be that one where the sperm literally fills the other being to the point it expands their size. Either that or vore I guess.

You mean cum inflation. Possible (sorta) to simulate but very dangerous.

Vore is on the "wouldn't actually do" list. Funnily enough, most of the people who constantly recite the ways they so desperately desire to be devoured with uncomfortably intricate detail don't actually want to be eaten.

Updated by anonymous

sniffing people's crotches/underwear

owo imagine da musk~~~

no

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
You mean cum inflation. Possible (sorta) to simulate but very dangerous.

Vore is on the "wouldn't actually do" list. Funnily enough, most of the people who constantly recite the ways they so desperately desire to be devoured with uncomfortably intricate detail don't actually want to be eaten.

I imagine they would want it to be real if they somehow could magically survive it. I guess the only thing preventing them from wanting it for real is death or pain? (I have no idea, just the first thing that comes to mind).

I forgot to add anal in my list. I don't usually say this because it is very common, so common that for some it is hardly considered a fetish. I can understand someone wanting to be penetrated that way I guess, maybe they just feel it better that way, nothing to discuss about it. But what I don't understand is why someone would want to put their penis in someone else's anus. It's a thing that bugs me because most penetration fanart I see is rather anal than vaginal, and in many of the vaginal ones I see comments asking for an anal version.
The only reason I can imagine is because it's more tight, but the fact that shit goes on in there makes it just both ridiculous and disgusting for me.

TL;DR version: I can understand people wanting to be penetrated anally (Although I don't relate to this) but I don't understand people that want to penetrate anally.

Updated by anonymous

Fenrick said:
sniffing people's crotches/underwear

owo imagine da musk~~~

no

Actually, that might be a pheromone thing.

ckgjkjj6 said:
TL;DR version: I can understand people wanting to be penetrated anally (Although I don't relate to this) but I don't understand people that want to penetrate anally.

Homosexuality, lack of pregnancy and the other one wants it are some possible reasons. Personally, I'm not a fan of backdoor bandits either.

Updated by anonymous

Honestly, I understand most fetishes to some extent, even though I'm pretty vanilla. I sort of get even really "out there" fetishes like scat, vore, inflation, watersports, musk, and so on. I find them unappealing personally, but I at least understand what the appeal is.

With that in mind... The one I really don't get is... foot fetish. One of the most "normal" ones, in a way, but I totally do not understand the appeal in any way whatsoever, and I don't think I ever will.

Like, I like the look of paws, don't get me wrong. And well drawn hindlegs can make an image more appealing... But to focus on the feet as the sexual object themselves? I don't get it.

Even more so with human feet, which I find to be just about the least appealing thing on the planet. More power to the people who like them, I suppose. Nothing wrong with it, everyone has their own tastes and certainly people find my own interests inexplicable... But I just don't understand it.

Updated by anonymous

this is one of the reasons i keep post #37194 in my favorites. for this particular gasm drive is worthy of ALL "what" type of tags here. so whatever fetish gasm_drive belongs to.

although...there is this one other post i found long ago... do you like your titty butts eternally flexing repeatedly?

note: not everything in my favorites is because i'm into that kind of stuff. in fact, the gasm_drive pic is blacklisted but...it has its uses.

Updated by anonymous

I don't care or thing about the others and their stuff, but I guess it would be the one where you kill people.

Updated by anonymous

BDSM and whatever fetish involves insulting someone. I do not understand liking the feeling of pain and insults look/sound out of place when fucking someone...

Updated by anonymous

I'm not sure if I find any fetish "ridiculous". There are some I don't understand at all, but I wouldn't call them ridiculous.

There are ones I'm not into that I can get, like I can understand why someone would like it. Ones that I don't get though would be like, death and dismemberment (way back when I was surprised by the number of photomanipulators on DA who do this with photos of models).

Most all of my fetishes aren't anything I'd do in real life. It's not that they're impossible or dangerous, it's that I'm just not interested in doing them in real life. Fictional things are much more appealing. Also some of them are actually straight out phobias if taken to reality, which are somehow therapeutic to play around with in the realm of fiction.

Updated by anonymous

Any fetish that violates normality of interpersonal relationships from being 'cute' to the point where it affects many aspects of the livelihood of an individual.

Updated by anonymous

Peekaboo said:
castration

fakkin wierdos

Yeah, nothing gets your rocks off quite like literally getting them off.

Updated by anonymous

I hate any fetish that involves severe and/or permanent damage to a person. Like vore, guro, etc. It's just horrible. If I was dating the world's most perfect woman...like 10/10...then she suddenly said "and btw I enjoy masturbating to guro...love that shit." Relationship would be instantly over because there is something fundamentally broken and sadistic inside that person.

Updated by anonymous

Personally, I have nothing against feeling pleasure by fantasizing about things that the individual wouldn't actually do; but there are some fetishes that I don't understand how someone could like to do or even imagine; more specifically, anything that involves mutilation, excreta or necrophilia.

p.s. Not intending to offend anyone.

Updated by anonymous

Anything consensual among adults, without doing anything illegal or (that) harmful I'd say anything goes.

Updated by anonymous

i'm glad for the existence of candy_gore. it turns the raunchiness of guro into something more bearable, and more unique.

Updated by anonymous

I'm not one to judge but apparently there are some people out there only into straight vaginal sex where everyone's a human. The deviants.

Updated by anonymous

Dyrone said:
I hate any fetish that involves severe and/or permanent damage to a person. Like vore, guro, etc. It's just horrible. If I was dating the world's most perfect woman...like 10/10...then she suddenly said "and btw I enjoy masturbating to guro...love that shit." Relationship would be instantly over because there is something fundamentally broken and sadistic inside that person.

Well, there is a type of vore where whatever is being eaten is not self aware, like someone is just getting sexual pleasure out of eating a regular sandwich.

Now that I think of it, would all vampire porn be considered vore?

Updated by anonymous

Dyrone said:
I hate any fetish that involves severe and/or permanent damage to a person. Like vore, guro, etc. It's just horrible. If I was dating the world's most perfect woman...like 10/10...then she suddenly said "and btw I enjoy masturbating to guro...love that shit." Relationship would be instantly over because there is something fundamentally broken and sadistic inside that person.

That phrasing almost kind of makes you sound really shallow - I think I get what you mean, but the way you put it, it makes it sound like you're not willing to try to understand a person's darker urges or to help them cope with them.

Updated by anonymous

kamimatsu said:
Now that I think of it, would all vampire porn be considered vore?

I don't think drinking counts.

Updated by anonymous

Dyrone said:
I hate any fetish that involves severe and/or permanent damage to a person. Like vore, guro, etc. It's just horrible. If I was dating the world's most perfect woman...like 10/10...then she suddenly said "and btw I enjoy masturbating to guro...love that shit." Relationship would be instantly over because there is something fundamentally broken and sadistic inside that person.

I've known someone into Vore, and someone into Guro, and in both cases the correct word for them would not be "sadistic", but "masochistic". You seem to be assuming that the person imagines themselves in the position of the person inflicting the injuries, not the other way around.

Have you not considered that someone might have a different way of viewing these things than "Oh boy here I go killing again!"?

Rape fantasies are another thing in this same category. Someone can fantasize about raping someone, and they can fantasize about being raped. Sometimes, in the latter situation, it's a way of expressing the trauma they felt from a real scenario in their past in a "safe" way. To put it another way, someone who was at one point raped might have rape fantasies as a way to cope with that event, since in the fantasy the same actions might be occurring, but the fantasizer is actually in control this time (I.E., could stop or change the fantasy if they so chose).

It makes sense, in an odd way.

Updated by anonymous

Or it's another case of "wanting something you don't want" because rape is unwanted by definition.

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
I don't think drinking counts.

What about the person they drink from? Really anything involving the cliche seductive vampire has someone who is sexually attracted to their food. If done a specific way, it could also involve being sexually attracted to being drained. Hell, the Seduction skill in VtMB is basically for tricking people into thinking you gave them a hickey in some cases.

Updated by anonymous

Diapers, scat, watersports, yaoi, feral, bestiality, cub

Seriously, those two I don't get at all and never will. I think it's fucked up. There, I said it, sorry, not sorry.

Updated by anonymous

Clawdragons said:
I've known someone into Vore, and someone into Guro, and in both cases the correct word for them would not be "sadistic", but "masochistic". You seem to be assuming that the person imagines themselves in the position of the person inflicting the injuries, not the other way around.

oh? if i ever met someone who was into masochistic things then i'd let them handle all the super frustrating stuff in any video games we play. some of the stuff i've seen in games (normal games, not hacks) leaves me questioning wtf the devs were thinking.

Rape fantasies are another thing in this same category. Someone can fantasize about raping someone, and they can fantasize about being raped. Sometimes, in the latter situation, it's a way of expressing the trauma they felt from a real scenario in their past in a "safe" way. To put it another way, someone who was at one point raped might have rape fantasies as a way to cope with that event, since in the fantasy the same actions might be occurring, but the fantasizer is actually in control this time (I.E., could stop or change the fantasy if they so chose).

that sounds pretty messed up but i suppose it depends on how you look at it. for example, if you happen to watch a video or movie that sickens and/or frightens you and over time see the same thing a few more times until it ceases to bother you much, if at all.

perhaps it's something similar to that.

oh and i found what i assume is the female variant of the warty shitting dick-nipple monster i linked to earlier: post #37906 no shit this time, just...breasts...even ear lobe breasts... i'm not even going to ask what fetish such an image would belong to.

if i had a choice of 1 question to ask that artist it would be this: dude, wtf is wrong with your mind that led you to think such creations were a good idea?

Updated by anonymous

Futanari and/or Dickgirls I would say I find it odd more then anything. I never really understood the appeal of the whole chicks with dicks thing and just to clear it up i'm not talking about crossdressing/ transvestites( I have nothing against people that are into that sorta thing ). Although I do do like futa/female but futas by themselves or futa/male just not into it.

Updated by anonymous

There's plenty of possibilities for that one: Female domination, penis envy, male-on-female porn without the male, role reversal, male submission and possibly others.

Updated by anonymous

fox_whisper85 said:
Those last two, I hate those the most.

I understand could why you dislike those two, just the very idea that someone is actually attracted to stuff like that stuff outside of dirty comics/artwork gives me the creeps. I mean, I have looked at hentai since high school and I don't think theres anything too wrong with comics about highschool students fucking( anime done fucked me up in the head, thx japan ). But there is a point before it turns into straight up pedo bait. Funny thing is alot japanese people aren't to found of the more fucked stuff they become know for.

Updated by anonymous

I'm really curious how people have a scat fetish. Like, just...how? How do they develop an interest for that? They played with their shit when they were younger or something? But then again, there's a fetish for everything so I shouldn't be surprised

Updated by anonymous

the second poster was right; this thread is turning into a flame war.

Updated by anonymous

Waba_Grill said:
I'm really curious how people have a scat fetish. Like, just...how?

I don't want to play the brain damage card yet, so... Maybe they have a thing for squishy semi-solid substances in general? If you switched the scat with play-dough, would it make a difference?

Animals in general have an aversion to feces (few species are okay with it, even fewer seek it out) so being attracted to it is definitely out of place. If you want a more detailed explanation, watch the second half of this TL;DR video.

Updated by anonymous

MPREG /aka male pregnancy

I'm not trying to offend anyone thats into it but this is the funniest shit I ever seen. I would recommend anyone thats a hyper sensitive snowflake not watch it. But if you have a sence of humor go too 12:40 where he starts talking about sonic getting pregnant and you'll see some ridiculous fan fiction. Like shadow beating sonic because he won't get an abortion... Its actually a really funny video, like the reaction the fnaf fans have to some male pregnancy fan fiction.

Updated by anonymous

fewrahuxo said:
the second poster was right; this thread is turning into a flame war.

No one is trying to be hateful or purposely offend anyone, honestly grow up.

Updated by anonymous

ThoughtCrime said:
MPREG /aka male pregnancy

Yeah, there's way too many mechanical problems for this to work and I doubt many of the people who wank to it have really thought it through.

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
Yeah, there's way too many mechanical problems for this to work and I doubt many of the people who wank to it have really thought it through.

Porn is for fapping to. We're just weirdos who like to throw science in our porn.
Of course, even we occasionally just say fuck it, give her some tits:
post #770766

Updated by anonymous

fewrahuxo said:
the second poster was right; this thread is turning into a flame war.

This thread is a flame war like a candle is a wildfire.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
Porn is for fapping to. We're just weirdos who like to throw science in our porn.
Of course, even we occasionally just say fuck it, give her some tits:

At least putting tits on a shark jet thing makes more sense than impregnating someone without egg cells, incubating the baby-in-progress without a womb and birthing that baby without a vagina. If it's big round bellies they're after then fair enough, but the rest of it just doesn't work.

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
At least putting tits on a shark jet thing makes more sense than impregnating someone without egg cells, incubating the baby-in-progress without a womb and birthing that baby without a vagina. If it's big round bellies they're after then fair enough, but the rest of it just doesn't work.

i could maybe see it working via oviposition but otherwise, no, i'd have to agree with you 100% on this topic.

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
Yeah, there's way too many mechanical problems for this to work and I doubt many of the people who wank to it have really thought it through.

I doubt anyone that is into male pregnancy really cares if it's physical possible or not. I see it just as pregnancy porn fetish for dudes that like other dudes, or people that are bi, or I don't fuckin who really likes it.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
Porn is for fapping to. We're just weirdos who like to throw science in our porn.
Of course, even we occasionally just say fuck it, give her some tits

And thats how anthropomorphic pokemon became a thing.

Updated by anonymous

treos said:
i could maybe see it working via oviposition but otherwise, no, i'd have to agree with you 100% on this topic.

But humans don't that type of reproductive system and just imagining how many test monkeys it would take just too see if its even possible just worries me.

Updated by anonymous

Here's a little experiment: Choose one (or more) of your fetishes (or interests in general, really) and think long and hard about exactly why you like it. Try a little self-interrogation to see how much info you can dig up on yourself to explain why you like the things you like. Every time you come up with a subjective answer, dig further until you something more conclusive comes up.

Remember: There is always a reason, you just need to find it. "I just do." doesn't count. "I don't know." means you're not trying hard enough. Don't post your findings unless you really want others to know.

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
Here's a little experiment: Choose one (or more) of your fetishes (or interests in general, really) and think long and hard about exactly why you like it. Try a little self-interrogation to see how much info you can dig up on yourself to explain why you like the things you like. Every time you come up with a subjective answer, dig further until you something more conclusive comes up.

Remember: There is always a reason, you just need to find it. "I just do." doesn't count. "I don't know." means you're not trying hard enough. Don't post your findings unless you really want others to know.

You mean most people don't normally do this?

This idea interested me so much that I took a Human Sexuality class this semester to get even more insight on it. Fetishes were only a small part of it but the whole thing was very insightful.

Updated by anonymous

wolftacos said:
You mean most people don't normally do this?

From my experience, people usually skim the surface and stop. You'd be surprised how many people only like something because someone else does.

Updated by anonymous

Transformation. I just have no idea how that fetish develops it's just so surreal.
I can understand almost any fetish except this.
Hyper stuff are weird too but not as weird as transfirmation.

Updated by anonymous

Dyrone said:
I hate any fetish that involves severe and/or permanent damage to a person. Like vore, guro, etc. It's just horrible. If I was dating the world's most perfect woman...like 10/10...then she suddenly said "and btw I enjoy masturbating to guro...love that shit." Relationship would be instantly over because there is something fundamentally broken and sadistic inside that person.

I kinda agree with you. Sadism in a any form even if you are the one who is getting hurt, is not normal psychologically.

Updated by anonymous

Hexdragon said:
Transformation. I just have no idea how that fetish develops it's just so surreal.
I can understand almost any fetish except this.
Hyper stuff are weird too but not as weird as transfirmation.

Hey, guess what? I happen to be quite a fan of transformation, so perhaps I can offer a perspective for you on it.

When it comes to sex (the characteristic, not the action), I've had an... odd experience. I'm physically male, and I'm not exactly... completely unhappy with my sex, but I'm also not entirely happy with it either. Sometimes I think I might be happier if I were female, and other times I think the opposite. Whatever you want to call me or think of me in that regard is up to you, and I honestly don't even care - my mixed feelings are in regards to sex, I don't care in the slightest one way or another about my gender or how I'm perceived.

So, with all this in mind, to transformation - gender transformation in particular is a way to deal with these sorts of thoughts in a way. It allows me to think about myself as female for a time.

I've actually talked to a couple of trans* individuals who also claimed to have a transformation fetish, so it could be that this is a common experience. A way of working out one's own perception of sex and gender - which naturally, would have an impact on sex and sexuality, leading to the "erotic" nature.

There were probably also some "formative" experiences for me as well in this regard. I remember when I was younger... And this is rather silly, but even before puberty, I remember reading this Goosebumps book, and it having an effect on me. Combined with my orientation towards animals, it makes sense that my interest in transformation could reasonably include species transformation as well.

I don't really expect that you'd see the appeal in transformation yourself, but maybe this could help you to understand why someone else might.

BlueDingo said:
Here's a little experiment: Choose one (or more) of your fetishes (or interests in general, really) and think long and hard about exactly why you like it. Try a little self-interrogation to see how much info you can dig up on yourself to explain why you like the things you like. Every time you come up with a subjective answer, dig further until you something more conclusive comes up.

Remember: There is always a reason, you just need to find it. "I just do." doesn't count. "I don't know." means you're not trying hard enough. Don't post your findings unless you really want others to know.

A detailed enough examination for you? Heh.

Updated by anonymous

Clawdragons

Interesting. So it can be traced back till childhood than it's a bit more undrstandable as a child you can get interesting feelings from many stuff.
I would study fetishes, but the society wouldn't got much from that data.

Updated by anonymous

Hexdragon said:
Sadism in a any form even if you are the one who is getting hurt, is not normal psychologically.

Huh, I knew I was crazy

Updated by anonymous

Hexdragon said:
I kinda agree with you. Sadism in a any form even if you are the one who is getting hurt, is not normal psychologically.

That's masochism. Those taking part in either in relationships tend to have safeguards in place so they know if the line has been crossed. A big part is trust that the other person will not continue if that life is crossed.

Personally, I don't understand either, being highly sensitive to physical pain and as a very untrusting person. Along with reasons better explained at a police station than a public website.

Updated by anonymous

Inflation
Foot
Human/Anthro
Human/Feral
Cuntboy/Dickgirl/Herm
Gore
Scat
Watersports

Updated by anonymous

Hexdragon said:
Transformation. I just have no idea how that fetish develops it's just so surreal.
I can understand almost any fetish except this.
Hyper stuff are weird too but not as weird as transfirmation.

Clawdragons said:
Hey, guess what? I happen to be quite a fan of transformation, so perhaps I can offer a perspective for you on it.

Hey Claw, when Hex was talking about transformation fetish. I think ( don't want to put words in his mouth just making an assomption here ) he might of been describing something like this, which entails a bit more then what you were describing and could be considered a bit odd.

Updated by anonymous

I like vore, as in via the throat, I just can't seem to get cockvore though. No offence to those who like it, I'm sure its great but try as I might, I can't get it.

Updated by anonymous

ThoughtCrime said:
Hey Claw, when Hex was talking about transformation fetish. I think ( don't want to put words in his mouth just making an assomption here ) he might of been describing something like this, which entails a bit more then what you were describing and could be considered a bit odd.

I'm not really a fan of that guy so I'd rather not watch a fifteen minute video of his. Sorry. If you like you can give me a short version.

Updated by anonymous

rhyolite said:
I like vore, as in via the throat, I just can't seem to get cockvore though. No offence to those who like it, I'm sure its great but try as I might, I can't get it.

I sincerely hope you've only tried to "get it" mentally.

Updated by anonymous

got a whole laundry list of fetishes i have a problem with

but like vore, snuff and related things such as permanent encasement/other forms of bullshit like that actively angers me

like how low does one have to get to reach the point where the depicted abuse, or indeed death, of another living thing gets them off. And yes, i know it's fictional but it's still a depicted death/gross abuse for no good reason other than getting some guy over there somewhere to cum in their pants

Updated by anonymous

Saddamasochism: a fetish for being tortured by Saddam Hussein

Updated by anonymous

Fetishes are ridiculous. That's why people like them.

But honestly, one fetish that never seems to get enough attention are extremely, overly-sexualised furry orgies.

Updated by anonymous

rhyolite said:
I like vore, as in via the throat, I just can't seem to get cockvore though. No offence to those who like it, I'm sure its great but try as I might, I can't get it.

Did you try asking nicely?

I know sounding is a thing (which is NOT what it sounds like and generally not a good idea) but yeah, most of cock vore doesn't make sense, especially the character dissolving part.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1
  • 2