Title's a handful but states everything. I'm a sucker for good f/f content which is aimed at/catered to women, I think mainly because it (tends to) be more realistic and real feeling and/or based upon actual feelings and experiences in these situations. I think it's more of the latter tho, I really enjoy realistic, cute f/f content, tho also it's heavily relatable since I'm bi and not a man.

Have any favorite artists that are this you wanna share? A couple examples off the top of my head with some example pics:

sunflowerbun
post #1474782 post #1468261

fluffyboobs
post #1311568 post #1311565 post #1311392

jush
post #1273682 post #1244225 post #1183327

god i wish this sort of content was more common. good chunk of the f/f content on this site is really blatantly made by male authors with male audience in mind (intentionally or not, but it shows and clearly) and i dont like looking that stuff at all.

Eggplant said:
god i wish this sort of content was more common. good chunk of the f/f content on this site is really blatantly made by male authors with male audience in mind (intentionally or not, but it shows and clearly) and i dont like looking that stuff at all.

Same honestly! That's kinda why I made this thread lmao. Glad I wasn't alone

Eggplant said:
god i wish this sort of content was more common. good chunk of the f/f content on this site is really blatantly made by male authors with male audience in mind (intentionally or not, but it shows and clearly) and i dont like looking that stuff at all.

I dislike it when female/female art has both participants looking at the viewer, like "oh this isn't real, it's just a show put on for the (presumably male) viewer."

The only artist I can think of off the top of my head that hasn't been mentioned is whimsydreams. Admittedly she does a fair amount of male/female stuff as well, but I think she probably qualifies all the same?

It's really difficult to find female/female feral art in general.

*sits down in chair* This is a good thread. Dare I say this is what a great set would be?

Clawdragons said:
I dislike it when female/female art has both participants looking at the viewer, like "oh this isn't real, it's just a show put on for the (presumably male) viewer."

Yaaaas. I hate that. and I hate "well, she's a girl, but she is acting basically exactly like a male would, but with a pussy." ... not to say that women cannot act masculine, or aggressive or anything... just.. well, it's one of those things that says "I am a male artist and I made this for a male audience" because it's such a common trend.

here's my paltry additions to the pile-- based on the image not the artist, though.

post #82539 post #112683 post #126604 post #210903

looking at set,s there's the "happy lesbian" set (set #3068 ) which features several penises, but...

there's also set #7116 the "lesbian/yuri" set that ... seem pretty male-gaze-y, but there might be some good stuff in there...

I'm not really familiar with many exclusively f/f artists, but here's a dump of some favorites that might fit the bill:

post #612675 post #1076023 post #1167845 post #1428744

Just for comparison, can someone give an example on the kind of f/f you're not looking for?

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Just for comparison, can someone give an example on the kind of f/f you're not looking for?

This. I can’t tell the difference between f/f that was made for men versus f/f content that was made for women.

SharkFetish said:
This. I can’t tell the difference between f/f that was made for men versus f/f content that was made for women.

The difference is probably that the things posted in this thread are pretty tame.
No bdsm, cub, guro, shit/piss, inflation, vore, hyper, etc.
not even strap-ons

edit:
Let's make another thread about male/male porn made by str8 females for str8 females, and how it's different from manly sweaty hairy homoporn.
But I suspect most of the gay porn for women is written porn ("How Kirk and Spock found their undying love for each other") so it isn't on e6.

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Just for comparison, can someone give an example on the kind of f/f you're not looking for?

post #1216953

This is one of the most obvious "made for a male audience" things I've seen.

I don't really want to portray myself as an expert on this. I can link some of the stuff I like and some of the stuff I don't like, but my own gender is... I'm not even sure where I should categorize myself, so I'm trying to not be too talkative here except in cases where it's really obvious.

But screw it. If I'm wrong, someone else can correct me.

First of all:

Munkelzahn said:
The difference is probably that the things posted in this thread are pretty tame.
No bdsm, cub, guro, shit/piss, inflation, vore, hyper, etc.
not even strap-ons

Personally, I like this:

post #1209712

Which at least has some bondage. Though admittedly there are some male-view-ish aspects to this. Also, one of my lesbian friends is a fan of vore, so that's certainly not a disqualifier.

I would suspect that even if people in this thread had some sort of more extreme fetish, they wouldn't be sharing it since it's supposed to be a more general interest thread.

Anyway, to answer the original question, about how do you determine female/female made for females and female/female made for males... In my probably uninformed and dumb opinion, the best way to determine is to ask yourself whether an image is meant to be enjoyed from the point of view of a watcher or third party, or meant to be enjoyed from the point of view of one of the participants.

For comparison:

post #736902

The Lugia is focused on the Latias. The Latias is focused on what's going on betwixt their legs. Both participants are focusing on... what could reasonably be expected that they might focus on during sex. Compare the first image, where they seem to barely be paying attention to each other.

There's more too it than that, and I'm simplifying it a lot. And again, I'm probably not the best to ask about this. But whatever. Hopefully someone else can give you a better (and probably more concise) response.

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Just for comparison, can someone give an example on the kind of f/f you're not looking for?

SharkFetish said:
This. I can’t tell the difference between f/f that was made for men versus f/f content that was made for women.

Most telltale signs can vary from piece to piece but there are some signature ones that are pretty common:¹

• Looking directly at the camera while engaged with and/or near one another, fulfilling the viewer's fantasy of performing for them. The take your pick theme also fits here; often it crosses with the former.

post #1158205 post #1396710 post #1047232 post #836067

• A good chunk of comparing breasts/breast envy

post #98415 post #1280749 post #1335828

• Intensely huge lips (usually thick bottom lip), heavy makeup/accessories/"bimbo" aesthetic, etc.
• Static body types that are the exact same, with not a lot of varying body types. Either that or fitting into very rigid, repetitive set of 2 or 3 types used over and over. Often these bodies are squeaky round/plastic-y/lacking natural imperfections.

¹ Note these aren't like "official" rules or anything, nor does it always 100% apply. These also vary wildly from person to person, these are just how I feel honestly. This is really a pretty heavily opinionated topic many are bound to disagree with! I would just very much like to see more f/f content made specifically for women, is all! They're cute and good imo

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:

• A good chunk of comparing breasts/breast envy

I'd like to add that a lot of the stuff with ridiculously-large-boobs also, in my opinion, tends to fit. I mean, I'm sure there's probably some women who like female/female art and are into hyper breasts, but as a whole super large breasts seem to be more for male appeal than female appeal.

• Intensely huge lips (usually thick bottom lip), heavy makeup/accessories/"bimbo" aesthetic, etc.

This drives me bonkers, because there's still no way to blacklist prominent bottom lips.

common stuff for f/f content intended for male audience:
- characters look like stereotypical porn actors
- characters look like they are performing for viewer rather than having sex with someone
- characters wear stuff like high heels, skimpy sex roleplay costumes etc (not saying that real lesbians dont wear that stuff ever, but i rarely see them draw stuff like characters making out in in Sexy Nurse™ costume)
- characters have exaggeratedly feminine "perfect" bodies (big tits, narrow waist, wide hips, big ass, skin shows no visible hint of character containing any muscle or fat)
- uncomfortable pin-up poses designed for showing tits and ass for camera, weirdly arched backs constantly and so on

Protip: you're not the only lesbian / bisexual woman

An awful lot of women-who-like-women like lecherous bimbo crap just as much as (some, straight) men do, quit the apotheosis stereotype bullshit, you don't represent some collective interest of women to have "morally superior" fucking porn

FibS said:
Protip: you're not the only lesbian / bisexual woman

An awful lot of women-who-like-women like lecherous bimbo crap just as much as (some, straight) men do, quit the apotheosis stereotype bullshit, you don't represent some collective interest of women to have "morally superior" fucking porn

...did you read the thread at all. this is a thread where people are trying to find specific kind of content and then describing what it is exactly what they are not trying to find to make the searching process easier.

this thread is NOT not say that women are not allowed to like certain kind of f/f content or that women are inferior if they like it.

"i dont like X at all, i would like to see Y but its difficult to find due the overwhelming amount of X. here is list of things that is different between X and Y so people would understand what we are trying to find" does not mean "anyone who likes X is inferior and should feel bad, im better for liking Y"

Eggplant said:
...did you read the thread at all. this is a thread where people are trying to find specific kind of content and then describing what it is exactly what they are not trying to find to make the searching process easier.

this thread is NOT not say that women are not allowed to like certain kind of f/f content or that women are inferior if they like it.

The problem is the misleading title.

You're basically looking for posts that could be tagged romantic_couple, which is more about visible passion than wanton lust. Adding to the other disqualifiers, I expect art featuring leering, grinning, and smirking are more often turn-offs than turn-ons.

Pretty much nothing I would have fav'd. My favs that...

• should be relevant:

post #1316564 post #727551 post #907921

• might be relevant:

post #295575 post #384761

• are strap-ons relevant?

post #930293 post #871599
(of these two, morticus f/f and marjani f/f seem to have a few more relevant results)

That's it lol. This was a fun and quick exercise. I am too obvious.

ecmajor has plenty of solo females that seem to have the desired demeanor.

What about female_pov? Do those work?

FibS said:
Protip: you're not the only lesbian / bisexual woman

An awful lot of women-who-like-women like lecherous bimbo crap just as much as (some, straight) men do, quit the apotheosis stereotype bullshit, you don't represent some collective interest of women to have "morally superior" fucking porn

I literally never said I was superior lmfao, I in fact said this was highly opinionated and disagreeing with me is fine. CalmDown.jpg

Furrin_Gok said:
The problem is the misleading title.

Apologies if it was misleading; I'm not the greatest with wording things

abadbird said:

are strap-ons relevant?

What about female_pov? Do those work?

Yeah, those both tend to be fine.

FibS said:
Protip: you're not the only lesbian / bisexual woman

An awful lot of women-who-like-women like lecherous bimbo crap just as much as (some, straight) men do, quit the apotheosis stereotype bullshit,

Of course they do.

And some men like sweet lovey dovey stuff. We are not declaring absolutes. Why do people insist on taking any casual statement as a declaration that ALL things are that way? It's pretty crazy. Not all women hate bimbo crap. Not all men like Bimbo crap. Not all apples are sweet. Not all apples are tart. Me saying "I love sweet delicious apples" it not denying the existence of tart apples. I'm saying that the apples *I* like tend to be sweet. It doesn't mean that I hate tart apples, or never eat them. It doesn't make me a hypocrite if I enjoy a granny smith. Y'all need to relax.

you don't represent some collective interest of women to have "morally superior" fucking porn

No, women do not have morally superior porn. Nor to men. we have *different interests* though. Some men wear boxers, some wear briefs, some wear boxerbriefs. All are made for men. I, a woman, could put on your briefs, and it'd probably be suitable for my needs, but it wouldn't fit as well as panties made with my hips and personal needs in mind. A man would wear panties and it would probably fit, but it wouldn't work as well as a pair of briefs, being designed for a different body.

And if you're a man and you like panties? all the more power to you. If you're a girl and like boxers? COOL! there's nothing wrong with that.

There is not anything 'wrong' or 'morally superior' about anyone's underwear. Just that we have different needs that tend to lead to different preferences.

Okay.

So. Let's talk about the Male Gaze.

The male gaze is the act of depicting the world and the women in it from a masculine point of view, and often focuses on women as a object of male pleasure. A very simple example of this would be a superhero who wears high heels. There are women who might prefer to wear that, but high heels would be quite impractical for most (but not all) superheros.

and I could go on considerably about this, but I'd mostly be rambling: consider this though: People make movies that they, themselves, would enjoy. historically, men make most movies. Therefor, most men make movies that most men would enjoy.

Again, not all.

Further, men and women traditionally enjoy different aspects of media. If a stereotypical man and a stereotypical woman made the same movie, the male director's would likely involve more focus on the action scenes, and scenes of triumphing over difficult odds, while the female version will put more emphasis on social interactions, and the development of characters into better--or worse--people. The same story can be told, but in different ways.

For pornography, men typically appreciate more showy postures that are generally not comfortable for women, as well as very sexually aggressive women. Females, on the other hand, prefer stories that are mildly more plausible and a hint of an emotional connection. it's not that they can't fuck the pizza boy, it's that how the filmmaker approaches pizza boy fucking that is different.

There's a whole MOUNTAIN of differences involved here, but I'm really not going to get into it. Bottom line thoguh is women are generally wired (socially and/or biologically) to like certain thigns while men like certain other things.

So... let's not shame anyone one way or another about liking certain types of porn.

@SnowWolf thanks for the in-depth textual explanation! Good stuff and exactly what I was intending. Me wanting to see more f/f made more for women doesn't mean anything else is somehow morally superior or bad, nor does it mean I'm speaking for all women or that they can't be into more tailored for men stuff.

The only artist I can think of that might interest you is vexstacy. However she mostly draws just solo female content. Her f/f pics I found are:
post #507308 post #579466 post #619838 post #776158

Other than that here are some pics from my favs that might be relevent:
post #553269 post #804138 post #845935 post #1559691 post #1473962 post #1355221 post #1424352 post #1449749

edit: added in a few more pictures that might be relevent
edit: fixed a thumbnail

I don't know any specific artists, but here's a few of my personal favorites:

post #1557393 post #1351718 post #183363 post #221637 post #1452056 post #1405548 post #173746 post #786007 post #703274 post #515510 post #222889 post #676838

I can't speak for other women, but my favorite tag (in general, I can't stand any art with it) to remove from my searches is 'looking_at_viewer'. Doesn't mean I want to blacklist it entirely, but removing that tag alone can make searching for nice/cute/romantic/cuddly pictures so much easier.

It also might be the tag I've added most out of all of them.

Also, to directly respond to the OP's title question, Kacey Miyagami, 100%.