There's a "going to heaven" tag here, right?
Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions
There's a "going to heaven" tag here, right?
beholding said:
Do you mean an adoptive child, or a child from infidelity?
From infidelity
avaliab said:
From infidelity
Ain't that called a "bastard child?" Doesn't seem to be a tag. It might need to be a lore tag because of its nature, like the rest of the family tags.
Is there a tag for official NSFW artwork, like sex scenes from visual novels or cutscenes from BG3 (which I guess aren't on here anyway)? Not sure if it would even be a regular tag (original_creators?) or lore (canon_event?) tag.
kevsnowcat said:
Is there a tag for official NSFW artwork, like sex scenes from visual novels or cutscenes from BG3 (which I guess aren't on here anyway)? Not sure if it would even be a regular tag (original_creators?) or lore (canon_event?) tag.
Images/clips from games aren't allowed.
https://e621.net/help/uploading_guidelines
Bad Things to Upload
- Screen captures: Screenshots from games, still images from movies, video snippets from YouTube, etc.
- This includes all content created in sandboxes like Second Life, Minecraft, and similar.
- This also includes all ripped image files from visual novels and similar games.
Certain types of official promo material may be allowable, which would be tagged official_art.
watsit said:
Images/clips from games aren't allowed.
Certain types of official promo material may be allowable, which would be tagged official_art.
I feel like this is kind of an odd blanket rule. I get that commercial content wouldn't be allowed, but what about a free visual novel where the creator or artist already has other artwork uploaded here? I know there's quite a bit of "semi official" Morenatsu art here, for instance (and apparently official art too). Or abandoned work that the creator freely released? What if the artist posts official or or unused/development art to their FA? Is it fair game then? Not trying to argue, just feel like there has to be some nuance as to what's allowed.
kevsnowcat said:
I feel like this is kind of an odd blanket rule. I get that commercial content wouldn't be allowed, but what about a free visual novel where the creator or artist already has other artwork uploaded here? I know there's quite a bit of "semi official" Morenatsu art here, for instance (and apparently official art too). Or abandoned work that the creator freely released? What if the artist posts official or or unused/development art to their FA? Is it fair game then? Not trying to argue, just feel like there has to be some nuance as to what's allowed.
If it's art the creator has publicly released, it's generally okay (e.g. many conway_(game) posts are images the creator publicly released of scenes from their game). The rule is primarily for screenshots or gameplay clips created by third parties. Publicly released material from official sources can be okay, as long as UI elements are kept to a minimum, and it follows the rules about advertising.
Is there a tag for when a text is left unanswered? Such as in post #5334353.
do we have a tag for foot fetish stuff but for specifically more feral feet like post #4020240
mrgreeeeeeeeeen said:
do we have a tag for foot fetish stuff but for specifically more feral feet like post #4020240
https://e621.net/posts?tags=pawpads
this will get you covered
mrgreeeeeeeeeen said:
do we have a tag for foot fetish stuff but for specifically more feral feet like post #4020240
Combine search terms
pawpads foot_fetish
Is there a tag similar to willing_prey that implies willing death?
Is there a tag for that oddly specific thing that happened to meg in that mall Santa episode from family where he was thumping his leg??? I could not find a better way to word that so I'm sorryðŸ˜
gutswithgl0ory said:
Is there a tag for that oddly specific thing that happened to meg in that mall Santa episode from family where he was thumping his leg??? I could not find a better way to word that so I'm sorryðŸ˜
Straddling? More specifically, straddling_leg? And grinding?
Paw fetish is not foot fetish pls fix that
I find it mainly a problem to see that paws and feet are treated roughly the same, I don't like feet in general but I love paws, the issue is that there is a lot of confusion with paws and foot that always ends up with a melting of both, making very humanoid feet with paw pads, I want to avoid that mostly because paws can either be on hands as well. And not be focused on feet, there's a distinct kind of look that differentiates it from feet.
lucariel said:
Paw fetish is not foot fetish pls fix thatI find it mainly a problem to see that paws and feet are treated roughly the same, I don't like feet in general but I love paws, the issue is that there is a lot of confusion with paws and foot that always ends up with a melting of both, making very humanoid feet with paw pads, I want to avoid that mostly because paws can either be on hands as well. And not be focused on feet, there's a distinct kind of look that differentiates it from feet.
lucariel said:
Paw fetish is not foot fetish pls fix that
"Paw" as used by furries can refer to hands or feet, so a foot fetish pic can equally be called a paw fetish pic. It can refer to humanoid or non-humanoid hands and feet, plantigrade or digitigrade, with or without pawpads, fur or scales, etc. I'm of the opinion that the "paw" tags should be retired since it can apply to any non-human animal-based creature's hands and feet.
watsit said:
I'm of the opinion that the "paw" tags should be retired since it can apply to any non-human animal-based creature's hands and feet.
I mean, like, not sauropsids, but yeah.
Any of you guys know if there is any tags for "Utilitarianism" or "Brutalism" in reference to design? I can only find brutalist_architecture but it doesn't fit, I can't describe whyðŸ˜
If there is an alien race here, but they are basically just skinny jackals from outer space, then what species tags should I put?
Of course I added the tag of their species, but should I add the tag jackal? Alien?
Updated
distroyerofcpus said:
Any of you guys know if there is any tags for "Utilitarianism" or "Brutalism" in reference to design? I can only find brutalist_architecture but it doesn't fit, I can't describe whyðŸ˜
Can you give an example of an image for which brutalist_architecture is insufficient?
beholding said:
2 days with no response makes me assume the answer is "no". What should this be called? I was thinking background_shattering, but the effect can be used on objects too, as in post #1464499. metaphorical_shattering? shattered_image?
Just as a heads-up, I've decided to name this shattering_(effect).
Is there a tag for someone saying something along the lines of "just let it all out"? I know there's cum_request but that's mostly questions.
Example:
https://e621.net/posts/5340975
Is there a tag for artwork that includes the fill bucket artifacts that MSPaint can produce? Like in post #5337192
Is there a tag for "ambient_feral"? Sometimes I look through my old faves and see there's something setting off the "feral -rating:s" line on my blacklist, but when I check, it's only tagged feral because there's a non-anthro bird or fish in the background, or something like that.
roxythehorny said:
Is there a tag for "ambient_feral"? Sometimes I look through my old faves and see there's something setting off the "feral -rating:s" line on my blacklist, but when I check, it's only tagged feral because there's a non-anthro bird or fish in the background, or something like that.
Ambient_* species shouldn't be tagged feral, IMO. That kinda defeats the point of ambient_* tags.
Updated
leafdapple said:
Is there a tag for artwork that includes the fill bucket artifacts that MSPaint can produce? Like in post #5337192
Is there also a tag for 621 references like so
tetriswithhorseshoes said:
Is there also a tag for 621 references like so
Is there a tag for this kind of comfortable?
I've got a lot of examples from my favorites list
A lot of them involve sleep, but not all of them. It may or may not involve vore.
There's a "comfortable" tag and a "comfort" tag, which are basically the same thing, but they're both barely used and don't have wiki pages, and none of my examples have either tag.
I think we should standardize a tag for this, and we'll probably have to go through editing a lot of posts and give them the tag. I think it should probably be "comfortable", and all the "comfort" posts will have to be moved to "comfortable" or "comforting" (which is something separate from what I'm talking about)
https://e621.net/posts/5064249
https://e621.net/posts/5131776
https://e621.net/posts/5130431
https://e621.net/posts/5146437
https://e621.net/posts/5146436
https://e621.net/posts/5148885
https://e621.net/posts/2341950 (specifically the last frame)
https://e621.net/posts/1553900
https://e621.net/posts/4775186 (specifically the last frame, again)
https://e621.net/posts/2489658
https://e621.net/posts/4702283
https://e621.net/posts/2874562
https://e621.net/posts/4926560
https://e621.net/posts/2659278 (this one particularly)
https://e621.net/posts/3025168 (specifically the last frame)
https://e621.net/posts/2668868
https://e621.net/posts/1829084 (specifically the third frame)
99.99% sure this isn't a tag, most wouldn't use it, and no one would want to retroactively apply it, bit is there ant form of feral_porn tag or something? I would love to blacklist feral porn without losing the good posts out there that happen to have a feral in a non-lewd context.
Probably far too niche of a context, but figured it couldn't hurt to ask.
zoiethefox said:
99.99% sure this isn't a tag, most wouldn't use it, and no one would want to retroactively apply it, bit is there ant form of feral_porn tag or something? I would love to blacklist feral porn without losing the good posts out there that happen to have a feral in a non-lewd context.Probably far too niche of a context, but figured it couldn't hurt to ask.
bestiality is the closest tag i think
zoiethefox said:
99.99% sure this isn't a tag, most wouldn't use it, and no one would want to retroactively apply it, bit is there ant form of feral_porn tag or something? I would love to blacklist feral porn without losing the good posts out there that happen to have a feral in a non-lewd context.Probably far too niche of a context, but figured it couldn't hurt to ask.
feral_on_feral bestiality feral -rating:s solo feral -rating:s -anthro feral -rating:s -humanoid feral -rating:s -human feral -rating:s -taur
blacklisting those would theoretically catch most of it.
Is there a tag similar to gag_sequence, but for bondage in general? Depictions of characters progressively putting on more and more bondage gear, maybe in layers, in a visible sequence.
dba_afish said:
feral_on_feral bestiality feral -rating:s solo feral -rating:s -anthro feral -rating:s -humanoid feral -rating:s -human feral -rating:s -taurblacklisting those would theoretically catch most of it.
Oh shit, you can do compound blacklist entries like that? That'll help.
zoiethefox said:
Oh shit, you can do compound blacklist entries like that? That'll help.
Yes. You can do all sorts of things, if you're willing to figure out how to do it
Would we happen to have a tag for noisy blowjobs? Specifically for instances where the person giving the blowjob is making gagging and choking sounds, either in sound or onomatopoeia, usually as the result of rougher oral and irrumatio (Facefucking)? Stuff like post #5275790 and post #5234553, for example.
It's one of my favorite kinks, but it can be difficult to really find them - the choking on penis tag doesn't have much and the gagging tag doesn't seem to cover a lot of it either...
I feel like the fluffy tag is badly described. To me, fluffy should be snow leopard or samoyed, long fur puffed out. Fluffy would not work when it's silky and lies flat like an Irish setter, or shaggy like Chewbacca (though I guess he would be an edge case for fluffy) but the wiki just says "light and downy", which to me describes "velvety" more than fluffy. If the image was of an Irish setter getting shocked and poofed out, then it would be fluffy. https://e621.net/wiki_pages/2147
Noticed the fluffy and fluffy_ears tag on this one and... to me that's not even remotely fluffy. A golden would be fluffy (and then, only if the art actually made it look fluffy), a labrador would not. Nothing here looks fluffy to me, but I guess it technically counts by the current wiki description. https://e621.net/posts/5162916
To me something like that would be "velvet" or "soft", but neither of those are tags. "plush" would also work, but that would end up getting mistagged for plushie all the time. Is there already a tag for this I haven't thought of? I wouldn't consider creating one if we don't, when the fur is short we don't really have any way to tell if the fur is soft or coarse, and if we're using fluffy for pics like the linked one then any pic that has a hint of fur texture would be 'fluffy'.
kevsnowcat said:
I feel like the fluffy tag is badly described. To me, fluffy should be snow leopard or samoyed, long fur puffed out. Fluffy would not work when it's silky and lies flat like an Irish setter, or shaggy like Chewbacca (though I guess he would be an edge case for fluffy) but the wiki just says "light and downy", which to me describes "velvety" more than fluffy. If the image was of an Irish setter getting shocked and poofed out, then it would be fluffy. https://e621.net/wiki_pages/2147Noticed the fluffy and fluffy_ears tag on this one and... to me that's not even remotely fluffy. A golden would be fluffy (and then, only if the art actually made it look fluffy), a labrador would not. Nothing here looks fluffy to me, but I guess it technically counts by the current wiki description. https://e621.net/posts/5162916
To me something like that would be "velvet" or "soft", but neither of those are tags. "plush" would also work, but that would end up getting mistagged for plushie all the time. Is there already a tag for this I haven't thought of? I wouldn't consider creating one if we don't, when the fur is short we don't really have any way to tell if the fur is soft or coarse, and if we're using fluffy for pics like the linked one then any pic that has a hint of fur texture would be 'fluffy'.
Go make a dedicated topic about redefining the tag. Discussing here will do you no favours
Solo male/female
hinatsukino said:
Solo male/female
Depends what you mean by that. One male/female couple (and no one else)? Then duo m/f
One male or one female (and no one else)? solo ~male ~female
Exactly one male or exactly one female or exactly one male and female pair (with other characters)? Then head over to topic #43865
Looking for a tag name for a specific kink, most commonly seen in Japanese artworks.
Definition: Using a piece of cloth, clothing (commonly panties or pantyhose), or gauze/bandage that is sometimes soaked in soaked in lotion/lube to stimulate the glans, commonly as part of glans_torture.
Commonly paired with terms such as "lotion gauze"/"ãƒãƒ¼ã‚·ãƒ§ãƒ³ã‚¬ãƒ¼ã‚¼" (for the object) and "glans polishing" or "glansjob" (for the action).
Danbooru has it named as a cloth_glansjob, but I don't think it was called that anywhere else.
Wikipedia has a Japanese article called ãƒãƒ¼ã‚·ãƒ§ãƒ³ã‚¬ãƒ¼ã‚¼ (lotion gauze), but it is a stub article that only cites one source.
Examples:
post #5065068 post #4861540 post #3390519 post #4090940 post #4787276
thegreatwolfgang said:
Looking for a tag name for a specific kink, most commonly seen in Japanese artworks.Definition: Using a piece of cloth, clothing (commonly panties or pantyhose), or gauze/bandage that is sometimes soaked in soaked in lotion/lube to stimulate the glans, commonly as part of glans_torture.
Commonly paired with terms such as "lotion gauze"/"ãƒãƒ¼ã‚·ãƒ§ãƒ³ã‚¬ãƒ¼ã‚¼" (for the object) and "glans polishing" or "glansjob" (for the action).Danbooru has it named as a cloth_glansjob, but I don't think it was called that anywhere else.
Wikipedia has a Japanese article called ãƒãƒ¼ã‚·ãƒ§ãƒ³ã‚¬ãƒ¼ã‚¼ (lotion gauze), but it is a stub article that only cites one source.Examples:
post #5065068 post #4861540 post #3390519 post #4090940 post #4787276
tip blaming nope, i remember crocgator saying something about it but any mention of that seems to have vanished
Updated
snpthecat said:
tip blamingnope, i remember crocgator saying something about it but any mention of that seems to have vanished
After_orgasm_torture/overstimulation? Otherwise, I don't know. These tags are a bit different than the specific scenario TheGreatWolfgang described.
EDIT: OHHH, do you mean palming? Same concept, but done with one's palm rather than a cloth.
Updated
crocogator said:
After_orgasm_torture/overstimulation? Otherwise, I don't know. These tags are a bit different than the specific scenario TheGreatWolfgang described.EDIT: OHHH, do you mean palming? Same concept, but done with one's palm rather than a cloth.
It's not after_orgasm_torture or overstimulation since the act does not necessarily involve sexual torture or "forced" scenarios.
It is much more related to edging and orgasm_denial (in the case of a partner doing it to them while they are bound).
It's not palming either. It is similar, but this uses a cloth (more commonly a lotioned piece of gauze) instead.
I think the Wikipedia article I linked explained the concept better.
If there isn't already a tag out there, I might just start a discussion to make lotion_gauze the proper tag name, though I anticipate some challenges.
Anyone know if the glans modification here has a name? I thought I saw it once as an extreme body mod, but looking it up all I found was a lot of urethral splitting and cutting the tip off, nothing to make the corona narrower so it looks like the head is partially detached. The pic and description there's not really anything to indicate that it's anything more than "just another weird way to draw a dick that furries came up with" but it's otherwise humanoid, and I want to say I've seen it named before.
post #3503135 post #4878765
Is there a tag for when the shorts ride up like this, exposing part of the butt? I was imagining ineffective clothing would apply, but that's more general (and might not actually be valid in these situations).
leafdapple said:
Is there a tag for when the shorts ride up like this, exposing part of the butt? I was imagining ineffective clothing would apply, but that's more general (and might not actually be valid in these situations).
wedgie perhaps? The wiki says it's for when underwear/bottomwear is "pulled up from behind", but that seems a bit too strict to me. I've heard it used in situations where it creeps up in between the buttcheeks by other means.
watsit said:
wedgie perhaps? The wiki says it's for when underwear/bottomwear is "pulled up from behind", but that seems a bit too strict to me. I've heard it used in situations where it creeps up in between the buttcheeks by other means.
It also says it should be "behind between the buttocks". I'm not sure if the shorts are really "between" in these images.
leafdapple said:
It also says it should be "behind between the buttocks". I'm not sure if the shorts are really "between" in these images.
I'm pretty sure they would count as such.
is it just me or is young taking over/merging into tags that are flat out just pedo? (ie: cub an underage and even babies involved in intercourse) Those tags should be separate instead. Its getting harder to blacklist it is what im saying.
pics-sammyvoluntus- said:
is it just me or is young taking over/merging into tags that are flat out just pedo? (ie: cub an underage and even babies involved in intercourse) Those tags should be separate instead. Its getting harder to blacklist it is what im saying.
Do not add invalid tags. If you checked your tag edits, any tags that have been stricken-through (e.g., +underaged_penetration) are considered to be invalid.
Your new tag was removed in topic #55247 because it is essentially the same thing.
Next time, please read the young wiki before attempting to make new tags under your own definition. Young does include "pedo levels of young" as you have termed it in your latest tag edit.
If you are having trouble blacklisting, consider using the various young subtags available, i.e.:
Apparent Age | Tag |
---|---|
<1 | baby |
1-3 | toddler |
3-12 | child |
13-17 | adolescent |
do we have a tag for stupidity? like a character doing or saying something extremely unintelligent or ditsy
dreamscreep said:
do we have a tag for stupidity? like a character doing or saying something extremely unintelligent or ditsy
I feel like this is inherently subjective enough that having a designated tag probably wouldn't be possible; what could be defined as 'unintelligent' varies from user to user. Maybe using a combination of dialogue + intelligence_loss tags in your search might help? Sorry if it doesn't - I really tried to find some relevant tags that weren't dead/invalid.
I was looking for a tag for wholesome posts, and couldn’t find one.
reddestdog said:
I was looking for a tag for wholesome posts, and couldn’t find one.
"wholesome" is a subjective concept. That's better serviced by sets.
Go to the sets page as see if any of them tickles your fancy
Is there a tag for situations that are ambiguously perilous or safe? Thinking of vore, but also any situations that would normally be perilous, yet that characters go through without being worried at all (buried alive, encased, etc). Stuff we don't see the ending of, and that can reasonably be interpreted either way. Maybe something like "ambiguous ending" or "questionable peril".
circeus said:
Figured this would do better than the overly generic "new tag discussions" thread now that there's a separate new tag announcements.Is there/should there be a tag for characters wearing...
Socks and no shoes? Thankfully socks does not implicate footwear, but socks -footwear encompasses a broader range of legwear than what I'm talking about.
post #1144240 post #1149655 post #1145342 post #908433Shoes and no socks?
post #926729 post #1127258 post #1114910 post #1082992
I said it once and I'll say it again. baby blanket/security_blanket tag. come on.
Is there a tag equivalent for 'audible orgasm,' or a character/s moaning during or because of ejaculation? Example below, of which the only indicator for orgasm (aside from cum_inside which doesn't belong because of twys) seems to be the characters moaning during climax. audible_ejaculation doesn't fit since there's no sound effect for it.
Do we have a tag for the original language post of an image which has a hard_translated version as a child post?
The left one is english, the right one is original language.
The left is hard translated, so the right is... what? Original_language?
Updated