Just a few questions regarding what to tag and such (I'm still pretty new to all of this):

If you're tagging a ref/model sheet that's showing the same character but in several poses and such, is it still solo? I imagine it is, but just making sure.

Whenever there's a disembodied penis shown, is it automatically assumed to be male unless specified?

If there's just hands, feet or some other part only shown without any visible body attached, is it ambiguous unless specified?

If a female is performing fellatio, this would count as female_penetrated right? I imagine it would, just making sure.

If there's a conjoined character and only them (let's assume that they've always been like this, born as conjoined), is it solo?

If there's two characters that have been conjoined together, would the aftermath of them being conjoined count as duo or solo?

Most of these are pretty obvious, but I'd just like to verify my assumptions with those who are more adept at this than I.

Blacktail51 said:
If you're tagging a ref/model sheet that's showing the same character but in several poses and such, is it still solo? I imagine it is, but just making sure.

Yes. See multiple_poses.

Whenever there's a disembodied penis shown, is it automatically assumed to be male unless specified?

Always male, the male tag is automatically implied. Not sure what you mean by 'unless specified'.

If there's just hands, feet or some other part only shown without any visible body attached, is it ambiguous unless specified?

Unsure. At one point there was an admin decision that those shouldn't be tagged with sex at all. I don't know if that has changed.

If a female is performing fellatio, this would count as female_penetrated right? I imagine it would, just making sure.

Yes. But not if it's just licking or other such oral play.

If there's a conjoined character and only them (let's assume that they've always been like this, born as conjoined), is it solo?

Multi-headed characters (one body, 2+ heads) are counted as solo for tagging purposes (so for instance two hydras is duo instead of a group). Conjoined characters can be a bit more problematic to tag, but still solo as far as I know.

If there's two characters that have been conjoined together, would the aftermath of them being conjoined count as duo or solo?

Merged characters are usually solo. If it's a sequence that shows them before and after merging, then it's both duo (pre-transformation) and solo (post-transformation).

Genjar said:
Always male, the male tag is automatically implied. Not sure what you mean by 'unless specified'.

I mean like, if the disembodied character is being addressed as "she" or "her" by the character they're fucking.

Thank you for the info, Genjar.

Blacktail51 said:
I mean like, if the disembodied character is being addressed as "she" or "her" by the character they're fucking.

Dialog doesn't matter in this stuff.

Genjar said:
Always male, the male tag is automatically implied.

What would happen in situation where disembodied penis also comes with disembodied pussy placed so that it's obvious that the penis and pussy belongs to same being? 🤔

hiekkapillu said:
Dialog doesn't matter in this stuff.

I assume it matters when in a series of pictures, like a comic for example. A herm is fucking a female, then in another page you can only see the herm's cock. I assume then, this automatically wouldn't be assumed to be male, right?

Otherwise, with no context or just by dialogue, it's always assumed to be male. Right?

Blacktail51 said:
I assume it matters when in a series of pictures, like a comic for example. A herm is fucking a female, then in another page you can only see the herm's cock. I assume then, this automatically wouldn't be assumed to be male, right?

Otherwise, with no context or just by dialogue, it's always assumed to be male. Right?

Technically, yes. You are to follow the rule even though you know from previous pages. I'm forgiving when people don't because I think a comic is more tied together.

There are instances where text makes the cut for a tag. I can't think of many examples of the top my head but the incest tag is an exeption from conventional tagging policy. Text or previous knowledge are accepted reasons to tag it.

Blacktail51 said:
I assume it matters when in a series of pictures, like a comic for example. A herm is fucking a female, then in another page you can only see the herm's cock. I assume then, this automatically wouldn't be assumed to be male, right?

Otherwise, with no context or just by dialogue, it's always assumed to be male. Right?

What other pages have do not matter in gender tagging. Only thing that matters is what physical traits you can see in the specific posts.

Blacktail51 said:
If you're tagging a ref/model sheet that's showing the same character, is it still solo?

Yes

Blacktail51 said:
Whenever there's a disembodied penis shown, is it automatically assumed to be male unless specified like, if the disembodied character is being addressed as "she"

Yes, even if someone says she. What the text says is not considered during tagging.

Sorrowless said:
There are instances where text makes the cut for a tag.

Yes, name and species tags can use external or textual information. Based on names the incest tag is also an exception to TWYS.

Blacktail51 said:
I assume it matters when in a series of pictures

Nope, every post is tagged only based on what's in that post.

Blacktail51 said:
If there's just hands, is it ambiguous unless specified?

I believe so.

Blacktail51 said:
If a female is performing fellatio, this would count as female_penetrated right?

Usually, but fellatio commonly overlaps with non penetrative situations like penis_lick or cum_in_mouth after_sex or cum_on_face tongue_out.

Blacktail51 said:
If there's a conjoined character, is it solo? If there's two characters that have been conjoined together, is it solo?

Yes and yes I think but I'm less certain about the second one.