Some more questions regarding tagging and such (These are pretty obvious and strait-forward, but I'd still like to get confirmation about them regardless):

There's a picture of a solo character who's gender is indiscernible based off of the picture alone. The origin of the picture says that they're male. Should I substitute "ambiguous_gender" with "male" instead?

Similar to the previous one, say there's two characters having sex. The male is fucking the female, but it's unclear which of her hole's he's penetrating. If it's strictly said that it's "vaginal" at the post's origin, should I substitute "ambiguous_penetration" with "vaginal_penetration"?

If a picture contains a male transforming into a female (or vice versa) should I include both "male" and "female" or just one?

If a solo character is addressing the viewer, it's still "solo", correct?

There's two pictures, a character is fucking a female with their penis. One picture has a cutaway and the other without. The one without is tagged as "male/female". But the one with the cutaway shows the off-screen character's face with a pair of breasts below. Does the cutaway picture count as "gynomorph/female" and "intersex/female"?

Some penetration questions:

A solo picture of a female masturbating with a dildo. It's in her vagina. Should "female_penetrated" be added?

The tip of a male's penis is in a female's mouth, vagina or anus. Does "female_penetrated" and "male_penetrating" apply?

A character is fingering themselves or is being fingered, it's "[inserted gender here]_penetrated" right?

Nipple and penile penetration still count as "[inserted gender here]_penetrated" right? I ask because you don't really see these as often. I doubt anything's different, just making sure.

And my last question: How are you?

Blacktail51 said:
There's a picture of a solo character who's gender is indiscernible based off of the picture alone. The origin of the picture says that they're male. Should I substitute "ambiguous_gender" with "male" instead?

Source material does not matter in tagging this stuff.

Similar to the previous one, say there's two characters having sex. The male is fucking the female, but it's unclear which of her hole's he's penetrating. If it's strictly said that it's "vaginal" at the post's origin, should I substitute "ambiguous_penetration" with "vaginal_penetration"?

Same as above.

If a picture contains a male transforming into a female (or vice versa) should I include both "male" and "female" or just one?

Depends on image.

If a solo character is addressing the viewer, it's still "solo", correct?

Only characters that are directly visible in image count, implications of dialog does not matter.

There's two pictures, a character is fucking a female with their penis. One picture has a cutaway and the other without. The one without is tagged as "male/female". But the one with the cutaway shows the off-screen character's face with a pair of breasts below. Does the cutaway picture count as "gynomorph/female" and "intersex/female"?

If character can be verified as gynomorph from the post itself, then it can be tagged as such.

A solo picture of a female masturbating with a dildo. It's in her vagina. Should "female_penetrated" be added?

No, as it's stated in tag wiki, the tag is only for images where character is being penetrated by someone else.

The tip of a male's penis is in a female's mouth, vagina or anus. Does "female_penetrated" and "male_penetrating" apply?

Yes (see shallow_penetration)

A character is fingering themselves or is being fingered, it's "[inserted gender here]_penetrated" right?

Only if other character is fingering them, the tag applies.

Nipple and penile penetration still count as "[inserted gender here]_penetrated" right? I ask because you don't really see these as often. I doubt anything's different, just making sure.

It's still penetration, so the usual *gender*_penetrated tags apply.

And my last question: How are you?

Could use a long nap

hiekkapillu said:
Source material does not matter in tagging this stuff.

Huh. I always thought that it did. Alrighty then.

Thank you for the information. For most of these, I had a hunch about what the answer was, but I figured that I should get verification regardless.

hiekkapillu said:
Could use a long nap

Same, buddy, same.

Blacktail51 said:
Huh. I always thought that it did. Alrighty then.

https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=tag_what_you_see

Blacktail51 said:
Huh. I always thought that it did. Alrighty then.

Thank you for the information. For most of these, I had a hunch about what the answer was, but I figured that I should get verification regardless.

The only times that source information is used is in naming characters or supplying family identification. The second is a bit of a grey area, though.

Blacktail51 said:
There's a picture of a solo character who's gender is indiscernible based off of the picture alone. The origin of the picture says that they're male. Should I substitute "ambiguous_gender" with "male" instead?

Nope, every post is tagged only based on what's in that post.

Blacktail51 said:
The male is fucking the female, but it's unclear which of her hole's he's penetrating. If it's strictly said that it's "vaginal" at the post's origin, should I substitute "ambiguous_penetration" with "vaginal_penetration"?

Nope, every post is tagged only based on what's in that post.

Blacktail51 said:
If a picture contains a male transforming into a female (or vice versa) should I include both "male" and "female" or just one?

It depends. If the character is shown at the beginning and end (like post #1391748), the post might need both tags. If they're in the middle of transforming (like post #1442028), it might need an intersex tag.

Blacktail51 said:
If a solo character is addressing the viewer, it's still "solo", correct?

Yes, no matter what the character is saying. What the text says is not considered during tagging.

Blacktail51 said:
There's two pictures, a character is fucking a female with their penis. One picture has a cutaway and the other without. The one without is tagged as "male/female". But the one with the cutaway shows the off-screen character's face with a pair of breasts below. Does the cutaway picture count as "gynomorph/female" and "intersex/female"?

Yes, every post is tagged based on what's in that post.

MissChu said:
The only times that source information is used is in naming characters or supplying family identification.

Yes, name and species tags can use external or textual information. Based on names the incest tag is also an exception to TWYS.

hiekkapillu said:

No, as it's stated in tag wiki, the tag is only for images where character is being penetrated by someone else.

Well crap. Oh well, I'll keep that in mind from now on atleast.

Edit: wait, what about autopenetration?

A newcomer asked this in another, older thread, and they don't attract as much attention as a new one, so here's what he had to say.

TagYou'reIt said:
hi! brand new to the site, mostly just gonna tag things as the name suggests. i wanted to avoid making a new thread and this one seemed to be the most useful to me, but i apologize if i'm using this thread wrong.

there's a handful of posts i've seen with mastectomy scars but not the mastectomy scars tag (namely in visibly transgender). in addition, the mastectomy tag doesn't have a single post in it, which is kinda odd.

one thing i noticed was that the penectomy tag is used both for the process of removing the penis, as well as for characters that have already had their penis removed. which leads me to a couple questions:

• should mastectomy apply to the same principles as penectomy? in other words, should characters that have already undergone a mastectomy be tagged as mastectomy?
• if the answer to that question is "yes", shouldn't mastectomy scars be implicated to mastectomy?

thank you!

(edit: sorry, im not suggesting mastectomy scars be implicated to mastectomy, i'm asking if there's a particular reason it isn't.)

While I'm here, let me repost my message as well:

OneMoreAnonymous said:
Requesting sskomu_(artist) be changed to just sskomu.

Edit: ditto for shaza_(artist) and shaza.

While'I'm still here, I'd like to ask if I'm the only one seeing a cucking element in this pic.

post #1550460

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Well crap. Oh well, I'll keep that in mind from now on atleast.

Edit: wait, what about autopenetration?

Read the wiki.