Topic: smaller_penetrated / larger_penetrated

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #120 is active.

create alias smaller_penetrating (0) -> larger_penetrated (20971)
create alias small_penetrator_big_penetrated (0) -> larger_penetrated (20971)
create alias smaller_penetrating_larger (0) -> larger_penetrated (20971)
create implication larger_penetrated (20971) -> penetration (779504)
create implication larger_penetrated (20971) -> size_difference (311687)
create alias larger_penetrating (0) -> smaller_penetrated (42031)
create alias big_penetrator_small_penetrated (0) -> smaller_penetrated (42031)
create alias larger_penetrating_smaller (0) -> smaller_penetrated (42031)
create implication smaller_penetrated (42031) -> penetration (779504)
create implication smaller_penetrated (42031) -> size_difference (311687)

Reason: So they match the rest of the *_penetrating_* group.

Not sure if it's not too much just like topic #26683 though.

It would be nice to have some feedback to determine where we should draw the line considering those types of tags.

EDIT: The bulk update request #120 (forum #293395) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

Genjar

Former Staff

Ditto. Size difference always has larger and smaller characters. larger_penetrating_smaller/smaller_penetrating_larger are completely redundant. Unlike body types and such, there's only two states.

We also only need one pair from larger_penetrating/smaller_penetrating and larger_penetrated/smaller_penetrated. Alias larger_penetrated to smaller_penetrating and smaller_penetrated to larger_penetrating, and you get the exact same results.

Updated

  • 1