Topic: [REJECTED] Tag alias: panties_around_legs -> panties_down

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

haryldson said:
Sounds more like a typo with panties_around_leg to me, even if currently, most of panties_around_legs should be replaced with panties_down.

I've gone through the panties_around_legs tag, and I only had to correct 5 posts that should have had the [panties_around_leg]] instead - all the other 100+ posts were equivalent to panties_down. Barely anyone used the tag as a typo, the vast majority used the tag deliberately, presumably because they knew about the panties_around_leg tag and assumed that the equivalent tag for two legs would follow the same format, hence why it should be aliased.

d.d.m. said:
I'm unsure if panties_around_legs should be aliased or implicated to panties_down,

I don't see any difference in usage between the two tags to justify an implication - if panties are down to any degree, then they are around the legs. panties_around_thighs and panties_around_ankles can be implicated, because they refer to specific degrees of panty-downness, but "legs" covers the entire spectrum of down. Although I guess it is a matter of semantics whether or not you consider the ankles/feet as part of the leg.

Genjar

Former Staff

Based on the current tagging, this alias seems fine. Though it's hard to say for certain, if it's been cleaned.
Still, it's not worth a disambiguation, and panties_down seems more fitting alias for it than panties_around_one_leg. Tentative +1.

  • 1