The tag alias #52242 non-mammal -> invalid_tag has been rejected.
Reason: Vague tag.
EDIT: The tag alias non-mammal -> invalid_tag (forum #311920) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.
Updated by auto moderator
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag alias #52242 non-mammal -> invalid_tag has been rejected.
Reason: Vague tag.
EDIT: The tag alias non-mammal -> invalid_tag (forum #311920) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.
Updated by auto moderator
Would a search for mammal non-mammal return every post on the site?
New aliases to invalid_tag aren't supposed to be created any more, try submitting a BUR to change the category to invalid.
wat8548 said:
Would a search for mammal non-mammal return every post on the site?
technically there's zero pictured
wat8548 said:
...try submitting a BUR to change the category to invalid.
Oh. interesting to know. I just created an invalid_tag alias. No one said something to me.
I think it would be better to alias non-mammal -> non-mammal_(disambiguation) (and categorizing non-mammal_(disambiguation) as an Invalid category tag), since non-mammal is often a typo for other tags like non-mammal_breasts or non-mammal_nipples, but it could also be used for 'non-mammal characters' in a post.
d.d.m. said:
I think it would be better to alias non-mammal -> non-mammal_(disambiguation) (and categorizing non-mammal_(disambiguation) as an Invalid category tag), since non-mammal is often a typo for other tags like non-mammal_breasts or non-mammal_nipples, but it could also be used for 'non-mammal characters' in a post.
+1 to your suggession.
d.d.m. said:
I think it would be better to alias non-mammal -> non-mammal_(disambiguation) (and categorizing non-mammal_(disambiguation) as an Invalid category tag), since non-mammal is often a typo for other tags like non-mammal_breasts or non-mammal_nipples, but it could also be used for 'non-mammal characters' in a post.
Agreed with the suggestion! I would edit this request to what you suggested, but I don't know how to do that
The alias might need to be rejected first. I don't think an individual alias/implication can be edited. I made a mistake on the implication from topic #29879, and I don't think I can edit an implication either.
d.d.m. said:
The alias might need to be rejected first. I don't think an individual alias/implication can be edited. I made a mistake on the implication from topic #29879, and I don't think I can edit an implication either.
BURs are infinitely editable, every alias/implication suggestion should be a BUR
strikerman said:
BURs are infinitely editable, every alias/implication suggestion should be a BUR
Thanks. Mistakes were made, I'll make sure all of my future suggestions will be BURs
strikerman said:
BURs are infinitely editable, every alias/implication suggestion should be a BUR
This makes me wonder if 'Request Alias' and 'Request Implication' should be updated to enable the ability to edit, or if 'Request Alias' and 'Request Implication' should be removed entirely since 'Request BUR' itself can do much more than both of those.
The tag alias non-mammal -> invalid_tag (forum #311920) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.