Topic: casual -> invalid_tag

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

I'm really wondering why casual is an invalid tag. There is lot of casual situations where this tag could be useful, and not only when it is associated with another word like casual_nudity or casual_sex.

I would like to suggest than casual tag should be a valid tag and all casual_* tags should imply casual.

goldy said:
I'm really wondering why casual is an invalid tag. There is lot of casual situations where this tag could be useful, and not only when it is associated with another word like casual_nudity or casual_sex.

I would like to suggest than casual tag should be a valid tag and all casual_* tags should imply casual.

It's too generic of a term, IMO. It can apply to casual dress, casual talk, casual behavior, casual nudity, casual sex... There's not really much similarity for a general casual tag to be useful in finding or blocking something.

I could give many examples where this tag could be useful though. I'm into kinky stuff (like ws and scat) and one of my best turn on is to see representations of characters doing this casually, so we could add some casual_*kink* tag for this (I started a casual_scat tag) but not many people would tag this properly.

Maybe we could just make an alias to casual_behavior to remove ambiguity. But I don't see the issue with generic term, as long characters acting or do casual stuff, it should be good to add this tag.

  • 1