The tag implication #42332 topless_andromorph -> topless has been rejected.
Reason:
EDIT: The tag implication topless_andromorph -> topless (forum #319311) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.
Updated by auto moderator
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #42332 topless_andromorph -> topless has been rejected.
Reason:
EDIT: The tag implication topless_andromorph -> topless (forum #319311) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.
Updated by auto moderator
Please use a Bulk Update Request when you want to request many related implications and/or aliases at once instead of requesting each one separately to avoid flooding the forum.
Always give a reason, even if it seems obvious. It helps others understand your thought process and provides documentation.
I do see a reason why so many implications, though a bulk request would be better. Give me a sec...
gattonero2001 said:
Always give a reason, even if it seems obvious. It helps others understand your thought process and provides documentation.
Part of me really wants to see topic #29981 be enforced into a rule, so that people can't keep spamming empty proposals without any repercussions.
The tag implication topless_andromorph -> topless (forum #319311) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.
For anyone else who was confused, this was rejected because topic #31225 implicated this tag to topless_intersex instead, which itself implies topless.