The tag implication #43005 no_nut_sabotage -> no_nut_november has been approved.

Reason: I argue that no_nut_sabotage is a subset of no_nut_november, since as the name implies it's one character sabotaging another character participating in NNN. The sabotage tag appears to be growing in use, so it seems worthwhile to create an implication.
I also argue that this should be an implication rather than an alias, as participating in NNN and sabotaging NNN are two different (though related) acts.

EDIT: The tag implication no_nut_sabotage -> no_nut_november (forum #324714) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Technically, sometimes no_nut_sabotage is tagged on posts where nobody in the picture is actually participating in no_nut_november.

Example: post #2687256 (the sign says: "Sorry I made you fail No Nut November ♡")

But such posts are still inherently referencing the no_nut_november meme, so I suppose it should still be tagged as such. +1