The tag implication #43251 mint_mobile -> minty_(mint_mobile) has been rejected.

Reason: Company and Mascot

EDIT: The tag implication mint_mobile -> minty_(mint_mobile) (forum #324931) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Should be the other way around, the character should be implicating the company.

The bulk update request #1866 is active.

create implication minty_(mint_mobile) (38) -> mint_mobile (38)

Reason: The character minty_(mint_mobile) is a mascot and should imply the company that owns it, as other mascots do. Reverses the implication of the parent post of this topic, because aliases/implications cannot be edited after they are created.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1866 (forum #324946) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

The tag implication mint_mobile -> minty_(mint_mobile) (forum #324931) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

The bulk update request #1866 (forum #324946) has been approved by @bitWolfy.