The tag alias #58950 black_ear_tips -> black_eartips has been rejected.

Reason: is there any difference?

EDIT: The tag alias black_ear_tips -> black_eartips (forum #345561) has been rejected by @slyroon.

or at least one of the two

i’d prefer going with ear_tips as it’s consistent with tail_tip

Bump, I think it should be the other way around, black_ear_tips (507) is currently more used than black_eartips (124).

we usually use dipstick_* for markings like this, dipstick_ears has over 30k posts

sipothac said:
we usually use dipstick_* for markings like this, dipstick_ears has over 30k posts

tagging the color is still necessary though, I think. dipstick_black_ears or black_dipstick_ears don't sound very good imo.

m3g4p0n1 said:
tagging the color is still necessary though, I think. dipstick_black_ears or black_dipstick_ears don't sound very good imo.

we don't generally tag the specific colors for each marking we just do <color>_markings (see: tag_group:markings) so, black_markings dipstick_ears for this.

if we wanted to extend it further we'd probably do <color>_<bodypart>_markings (i.e. black_ear_markings) before having specific tags for each color of each marking type of each bodypart.

The tag alias black_ear_tips -> black_eartips (forum #345561) has been rejected by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #9546 is active.

create alias black_eartips (2) -> black_ear_tips (1442)
create alias brown_eartips (2) -> brown_ear_tips (674)

Reason: Aliasing the two populated *_eartips tags to their correct equivalents

EDIT: The bulk update request #9546 (forum #423158) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #9546 (forum #423158) has been approved by @spe.