The tag implication #50660 armpit_tuft -> armpit_hair has been rejected.

Reason: A tuft of armpit fur would always count as armpit_fur, which is aliased to armpit_hair.

EDIT: The tag implication armpit_tuft -> armpit_hair (forum #365648) has been rejected by @spe.

Shouldn't this be an alias instead? Pubic_tuft is aliased to pubes

The tag implication armpit_tuft -> armpit_hair (forum #365648) has been rejected by @spe.

wandering_spaniel said:
Shouldn't this be an alias instead? Pubic_tuft is aliased to pubes

Or kept separate, like with chest_hair and chest_tuft