The bulk update request #4920 is active.

remove implication prince_sidon (806) -> breath_of_the_wild (7963)
remove implication teba_(tloz) (735) -> breath_of_the_wild (7963)
remove implication saki_(tloz) (133) -> breath_of_the_wild (7963)
remove implication paya (153) -> breath_of_the_wild (7963)
remove implication harth_(tloz) (73) -> breath_of_the_wild (7963)
remove implication cecili_(tloz) (37) -> breath_of_the_wild (7963)

Reason: These characters aren't exclusive to Breath of the Wild, they also appear in its sequel, Tears of the Kingdom, so they should implicate the series instead to not mistag BotW on TotK posts. AFAIK, the champions (Revali, Mipha, Urbosa, and Daruk) and Kass don't appear in TotK, so I didn't include them, but I can change their implication if others thing that's best (in case there's another sequel where they do reappear, and/or if we're counting the Age of Calamity spinoff where the champions do appear). I'm also not entirely sure about Cecili, I'll need to double-check but I think she does appear in TotK.

It's not letting me add the replacement implications because it "already implies the_legend_of_zelda through another implication" (presumably the implication being removed), so that will need to be done as a follow-up BUR:

imply prince_sidon -> the_legend_of_zelda
imply teba_(tloz) -> the_legend_of_zelda
imply saki_(tloz) -> the_legend_of_zelda
imply paya -> the_legend_of_zelda
imply harth_(tloz) -> the_legend_of_zelda
imply cecili_(tloz) -> the_legend_of_zelda

EDIT: The bulk update request #4920 (forum #366891) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

This is why implying characters to specific game entries - or, even worse, suffixing them with a game's name - is a bad idea in general.

If we're being pedantic, the champions didn't only appear in BOTW either - they're all playable in age_of_calamity.

The bulk update request #4920 (forum #366891) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4929 is active.

create implication prince_sidon (806) -> the_legend_of_zelda (27962)
create implication teba_(tloz) (735) -> the_legend_of_zelda (27962)
create implication saki_(tloz) (133) -> the_legend_of_zelda (27962)
create implication paya (153) -> the_legend_of_zelda (27962)
create implication harth_(tloz) (73) -> the_legend_of_zelda (27962)
create implication cecili_(tloz) (37) -> the_legend_of_zelda (27962)

Reason: Part 2

EDIT: The bulk update request #4929 (forum #366993) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4929 (forum #366993) has been approved by @gattonero2001.