Topic: [APPROVED] Paint Implications

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #5630 is active.

create implication black_paint (42) -> paint (3703)
create implication blue_paint (78) -> paint (3703)
create implication brown_paint (10) -> paint (3703)
create implication green_paint (57) -> paint (3703)
create implication grey_paint (3) -> paint (3703)
create implication orange_paint (42) -> paint (3703)
create implication pink_paint (23) -> paint (3703)
create implication purple_paint (29) -> paint (3703)
create implication red_paint (84) -> paint (3703)
create implication tan_paint (0) -> paint (3703)
create implication white_paint (59) -> paint (3703)
create implication yellow_paint (40) -> paint (3703)
create implication teal_paint (6) -> paint (3703)

Reason: Connecting up the paint tags.

EDIT: The bulk update request #5630 (forum #378145) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

cloudpie said:
No magenta, magenta isn't an official color for e6 tagging purposes

Okay, fair enough. Are there any colors I missed that should be tagged?

Updated

cloudpie said:
Yep it's had a weird history but admins said teal is an official color (forum #355550)

At least until you ask them to get rid of the teal_* -> green_* aliases and then they just disappear into the shrubbery like Homer Simpson.

errorist said:
At least until you ask them to get rid of the teal_* -> green_* aliases and then they just disappear into the shrubbery like Homer Simpson.

Yeah lol I made a whole BUR with all of them that I could find after that announcement and... crickets

topic #37305

  • 1