The tag implication #58178 tank_top_only -> topwear_only has been rejected.
Reason: Tank tops are a type of topwear
EDIT: The tag implication tank_top_only -> topwear_only (forum #396187) has been rejected by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator
Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: tank_top_only -> topwear_only
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #7144 is active.
create implication tank_top_only (367) -> tank_top (51301)
create implication tank_top_only (367) -> shirt_only (4172)
Reason: tank_top implies shirt, so their respective only tags should follow that pattern.
EDIT: The bulk update request #7144 (forum #396188) has been approved by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator
If we wanted to get this granular with the *_only tags, tank_top implies shirt, making shirt_only the better target.
The tag implication tank_top_only -> topwear_only (forum #396187) has been rejected by @slyroon.
The bulk update request #7144 (forum #396188) has been approved by @slyroon.