The bulk update request #8289 has been rejected.

remove implication nightstar_(warriors) (5) -> warriors_(book_series) (2474)
create implication nightstar_(shadowclan)_(warriors) (0) -> warriors_(book_series) (2474)
create implication nightstar_(riverclan)_(warriors) (0) -> warriors_(book_series) (2474)

Reason: There's two characters named Nightstar, they should be additionally disambiguated.

EDIT: The bulk update request #8289 (forum #406341) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

I'm don't particularly like double suffixes, feels pretty odd to me, i think you can just remove the _(warriors) part and be fine

snpthecat said:
I'm don't particularly like double suffixes, feels pretty odd to me, i think you can just remove the _(warriors) part and be fine

We already have tags like this for two Animal Crossing characters:

carmen_(animal_crossing)_(mouse) and lulu_(anteater)_(animal_crossing).

snpthecat said:
I'm don't particularly like double suffixes, feels pretty odd to me, i think you can just remove the _(warriors) part and be fine

I prefer to keep *_(warriors) for the sake of search ease because there's over a thousand named characters. ^^;

We already have frecklewish_(thunderclan)_(warriors) and frecklewish_(skyclan)_(warriors)

theghost123 said:
We already have tags like this for two Animal Crossing characters:

carmen_(animal_crossing)_(mouse) and lulu_(anteater)_(animal_crossing).

nimphia said:
I prefer to keep *_(warriors) for the sake of search ease because there's over a thousand named characters. ^^;

We already have frecklewish_(thunderclan)_(warriors) and frecklewish_(skyclan)_(warriors)

https://e621.net/tags?search%5Bname_matches%5D=*%29_%28*

We have many examples already

theghost123 said:
We already have tags like this for two Animal Crossing characters:

carmen_(animal_crossing)_(mouse) and lulu_(anteater)_(animal_crossing).

Ugh

Double suffixed tags are indeed very cursed, but the species should at least come before the franchise.

The bulk update request #8289 (forum #406341) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

auto_moderator said:
The bulk update request #8289 (forum #406341) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

But... Why? The other replies clarified that double suffixes on character tags that are internally ambiguous are already a thing, including in the series the original BUR was about.