Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #63995 unwanted_impregnation -> impregnation has been approved.
Reason: unwanted impregnation implies impregnation is also happening
EDIT: The tag implication unwanted_impregnation -> impregnation (forum #409136) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
Could add some more impregnation related tags and make it a BUR:
There's also tags for andromorph_impregnation, gynomorph_impregnation, etc. but I don't know if we need all of those.
skybluegill said:
Reason: unwanted impregnation implies impregnation is also happening
Reminds me of an alias request from years ago (see topic #25498), so I will raise the same argument here.
I think that unwanted_impregnation sounds too vague, either choose between forced_impregnation or accidental_impregnation.
thegreatwolfgang said:
Reminds me of an alias request from years ago (see topic #25498), so I will raise the same argument here.
I think that unwanted_impregnation sounds too vague, either choose between forced_impregnation or accidental_impregnation.
unwanted_* could be used as the umbrella tag for forced_*, where it can include some extra cases. I'll admit the utility might be dubious, though the unwanted_* tags don't seem too unwanted
snpthecat said:
unwanted_* could be used as the umbrella tag for forced_*, where it can include some extra cases. I'll admit the utility might be dubious, though the unwanted_* tags don't seem too unwanted
What other "extra cases" would there be?
I had considered whether unwanted_impregnation could become an umbrella tag, but at this point, I could only think of forced_impregnation and accidental_impregnation as potential subtags.
However, I'm looking to cut down on unnecessary implication chains (e.g., topic #43628) when implying impregnation would just be equally sufficient.
The tag implication unwanted_impregnation -> impregnation (forum #409136) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.
