The tag alias #72290 transgender_penetrating_male -> invalid_tag has been rejected.

Reason: This tag appears to be used by a single person.

I see three issues with it:
1) It's not TWYS
2) The wiki contradicts the tag name:

Used for posts depicting a transgender character penetrating a male character, regardless of the body forms of either character

This is problematic considering male is a gender tag.

3) All but 1 of the tagged posts features a gynomorph so it's redundant considering you can just use gynomorph_penetrating_male with trans_(lore) tacked on

I don't think aliasing it to gynomorph_penetrating_male is the right move considering the name

EDIT: The tag alias transgender_penetrating_male -> invalid_tag (forum #418998) has been rejected by @popoto.

generally it's best, in these cases, to alias the tag to the closest adjacent valid tag rather than straight invalidation. to me, it seems like the best target would be trans_(lore).

dba_afish said:
generally it's best, in these cases, to alias the tag to the closest adjacent valid tag rather than straight invalidation. to me, it seems like the best target would be trans_(lore).

Or male_penetrated.

watsit said:
Or male_penetrated.

that might be technically better, yeah... but I think I'd still make the the "quick tag menu; first word" argument here.

dba_afish said:
that might be technically better, yeah... but I think I'd still make the the "quick tag menu; first word" argument here.

Yeah especially since male_penetrated would dominate the autocomplete. I wonder what's the tipping point between choosing the closest tag vs making sure not to mess up the autocomplete

The tag alias transgender_penetrating_male -> invalid_tag (forum #418998) has been rejected by @popoto.