The bulk update request #9256 is pending approval.

Reason: There are tags scattered about that specify the location of a mole on one's body. Some are decently populated, some barely so, but they all should imply mole itself.

Moles need more love methinks, creating these implications might encourage more usage for the lesser used tags too.

EDIT: As discussed below, I added a new mole_on_face tag to the BUR to serve as an umbrella for the common, more specific face mole placements, and perhaps to be of use for uncommon face moles.

I also considered the idea of creating a mole_on_face tag and make all the more specific facial moles (like mole_under_eye and mole_on_cheek) imply it, but I thought it might complicate things more than anything.

Should I consider editing the BUR to add that?

yand said:
I also considered the idea of creating a mole_on_face tag and make all the more specific facial moles (like mole_under_eye and mole_on_cheek) imply it, but I thought it might complicate things more than anything.

Should I consider editing the BUR to add that?

that'd probably be a good idea, I'd also flip the alias of beauty_mark to that tag as well.

dba_afish said:
that'd probably be a good idea, I'd also flip the alias of beauty_mark to that tag as well.

Done.
However I won't add that last part because afaik beauty_mark isn't limited to face moles, even if it's mainly used for them. The e6 wiki entry and Wikipedia both say as such too, so it's a common definition for the term, thus I'd rather not touch the alias.

The bulk update request #9260 is pending approval.

create implication heart_mole (71) -> mole_(marking) (16353)
create implication heart_mole (71) -> heart_(marking) (7341)

Reason: Went over the entry limit with that past edit, so I had to move at least 1. Plus, these 2 were extra to begin with.

A mole in the shape of a heart is a mole nonetheless, and a marking in the shape of a heart.