Topic: [APPROVED] Some missing prehistoric species implications

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #10388 is active.

create implication titanoboa (94) -> prehistoric_species (68027)
create implication lestodon (1) -> ground_sloth (44)

Reason: Some tags I noticed were missing the implication chain to get prehistoric_species

It seems megatherium doesn't imply it, either, but that's a weird situation. I think giant_ground_sloth tries to be the tag for Megatherium? But it also seems that this tag is often used in place of ground_sloth instead (but it also implies ground_sloth, so both get added at the same time, not sure what's going on there)

EDIT: The bulk update request #10388 (forum #439172) has been approved by @spe.

Updated by auto moderator