Topic: askin' about substance coverage tags

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

i've been poking at the various tags for substance coverage (e.g. cum_covered or covered_in_scat), saw inconsistencies, started formulating what a BUR might look like, and wanted to put a few thoughts out for discussion.

i figure that it would make sense to standardize the format a bit. covered_in_cum is already aliased to cum_covered, and the few tags of this type with wikis are the *_covered ones, so i figure that would be the normal format.
alternatively, there is also the word "coated". only one useful tag (cum_coated_pussy) really uses it but i wonder if "coated" might be clearer language than "covered". it would also separate it better from the various covered_* tags for people hiding parts of their body

i also saw that slime_covered is aliased to slime? i couldn't find when that happened, but i'd probably reverse it and just add an implication; this feels like a loss of information.

also if i do end up crafting a BUR i'd probably make sure some of the useful coverage tags that specify a body part (e.g. cum_covered_penis) imply the correct *_on_* tag (in this case, cum_on_penis)

thoughts?