The tag implication #67047 adult_blowing_young -> adult_on_young has been rejected.
Reason: Self-explanatory.
EDIT: The tag implication adult_blowing_young -> adult_on_young (forum #443478) has been rejected by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #67047 adult_blowing_young -> adult_on_young has been rejected.
Reason: Self-explanatory.
EDIT: The tag implication adult_blowing_young -> adult_on_young (forum #443478) has been rejected by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator
have we discussed the concept of x_servicing_y very much? we could probably merge all of the "directional" fellatio, fingering, rimming, handjob, titfuck, etc., etc. into one verb, like we did with x_penetrating_y.
"blowing" isn't the word we use for fellatio. We're also trying to avoid more <x>_verbing_<y> combo tags in favor of separate <x>_verbing and <y>_verbed tags.
The bulk update request #10750 is active.
create alias adult_blowing_young (7) -> adult_on_young (13720)
Reason: An alternative.
EDIT: The bulk update request #10750 (forum #443489) has been approved by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator
The tag implication adult_blowing_young -> adult_on_young (forum #443478) has been rejected by @spe.
The bulk update request #10750 (forum #443489) has been approved by @spe.
dba_afish said:
have we discussed the concept of x_servicing_y very much? we could probably merge all of the "directional" fellatio, fingering, rimming, handjob, titfuck, etc., etc. into one verb, like we did with x_penetrating_y.
I like it. Someone make a BUR or something, IDK. May as well try to get the conversation started.
servicing sounds good. I assume we don't want *_servicing and *_serviced? And will it be gender and form only, or will it include age?
I recently discovered we also have adult_sucking_young, which should probably also be aliased.
snpthecat said:
servicing sounds good. I assume we don't want *_servicing and *_serviced? And will it be gender and form only, or will it include age?
I would probably just make it a mirror of the x_penetrating_y tags but for exclusively non-penetrative sex acts.