Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: adult_blowing_young -> adult_on_young

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

have we discussed the concept of x_servicing_y very much? we could probably merge all of the "directional" fellatio, fingering, rimming, handjob, titfuck, etc., etc. into one verb, like we did with x_penetrating_y.

Watsit

Privileged

"blowing" isn't the word we use for fellatio. We're also trying to avoid more <x>_verbing_<y> combo tags in favor of separate <x>_verbing and <y>_verbed tags.

watsit said:
"blowing" isn't the word we use for fellatio. We're also trying to avoid more <x>_verbing_<y> tags in favor of separate <x>_verbing and <y>_verbed tags.

fellatio also feels like a particularly odd one, eh? since it's be impossible have ones for *ing_female or *ing_andromorph.

spe

Admin

dba_afish said:
have we discussed the concept of x_servicing_y very much? we could probably merge all of the "directional" fellatio, fingering, rimming, handjob, titfuck, etc., etc. into one verb, like we did with x_penetrating_y.

I like it. Someone make a BUR or something, IDK. May as well try to get the conversation started.

servicing sounds good. I assume we don't want *_servicing and *_serviced? And will it be gender and form only, or will it include age?

spe

Admin

snpthecat said:
servicing sounds good. I assume we don't want *_servicing and *_serviced? And will it be gender and form only, or will it include age?

I would probably just make it a mirror of the x_penetrating_y tags but for exclusively non-penetrative sex acts.