The bulk update request #10757 is pending approval.

create implication holding_dumbbell (139) -> dumbbell (2761)
create implication holding_dumbbell (139) -> holding_object (198745)
create implication holding_coin (87) -> coin (4818)
create implication holding_coin (87) -> holding_object (198745)
create implication holding_drinking_glass (36) -> drinking_glass (9027)
create implication holding_drinking_glass (36) -> holding_cup (7956)
create implication holding_badge (36) -> badge (3439)
create implication holding_badge (36) -> holding_object (198745)
create implication holding_marker (225) -> marker (1443)
create implication holding_marker (225) -> holding_object (198745)

Reason: Came across a couple that seem valid enough without implications attached.

Not certain if holding_drinking_glass shouldn't alias first to holding_glass_cup and that to holding_cup, like the base object tags do, but this seems like unnecessary level off granularity?