Topic: Some NC implications

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #10810 is pending approval.

create implication male_raping_female (3475) -> male_rape (4196)
create implication male_raping_female (3475) -> female_raped (3735)
create implication male_raping_gynomorph (8) -> gynomorph_raped (15)
create implication male_raping_gynomorph (8) -> male_rape (4196)
create implication male_raping_male (900) -> male_raped (2066)
create implication male_raping_male (900) -> male_rape (4196)
create implication male_raping_andromorph (6) -> andromorph_raped (12)
create implication male_raping_andromorph (6) -> male_rape (4196)
create implication male_raping_ambiguous (19) -> ambiguous_raped (25)
create implication male_raping_ambiguous (19) -> male_rape (4196)
create implication female_raping_female (124) -> female_rape (1707)
create implication female_raping_female (124) -> female_raped (3735)
create implication female_raping_gynomorph (6) -> gynomorph_raped (15)
create implication female_raping_gynomorph (6) -> female_rape (1707)
create implication female_raping_male (730) -> male_raped (2066)
create implication female_raping_male (730) -> female_rape (1707)
create implication female_raping_andromorph (1) -> andromorph_raped (12)
create implication female_raping_andromorph (1) -> female_rape (1707)
create implication female_raping_ambiguous (1) -> ambiguous_raped (25)
create implication female_raping_ambiguous (1) -> female_rape (1707)

Reason: Considering all the *_penetrating_* tags imply both a *_penetrated tag, and a *_penetrating tag; it feels like all of these implications should exist, too. And a lot more, besides, but the system only allows for up to 25 implications per BUR (plus I'm too tired to think of all of them, anyway).