Today, I stumbled on this thread on my Twitter feed by Rockrabbit that states that Zero_087 is an AI prompter. If that's the case, his works on this site would have to be removed, right? It's really sad and upsetting that this keeps happening. It also means I fell for it and tried to defend it. I haven't bought any of his works, but there are those who have.
Topic: Zero_087 might not be legit
Posted under General
I never trust anyone who's never drawn the same (original/niche) character twice. if they can only ever seem to draw popular characters and/or only ever draw new unique characters/adoptables, they're suspect to me.
dba_afish said:
I never trust anyone who's never drawn the same (original/niche) character twice. if they can only ever seem to draw popular characters and/or only ever draw new unique characters/adoptables, they're suspect to me.
this. there's one person who's stuff was deleted for ai but reinstated, and a recent pic they did as a commission looks nothing like anything else they've done and the rest is well established media characters... so kinda sus
hardshirt said:
Today, I stumbled on this thread on my Twitter feed by Rockrabbit that states that Zero_087 is an AI prompter. If that's the case, his works on this site would have to be removed, right? It's really sad and upsetting that this keeps happening. It also means I fell for it and tried to defend it. I haven't bought any of his works, but there are those who have.
If you want to make a report for potential AI work, you can do so by going to zero_087 and flagging the individual posts as "Does not meet the uploading guidelines" with this evidence attached.
Do not mass flag every single post from the artist, only the ones listed with concrete evidence on the thread.
thegreatwolfgang said:
If you want to make a report for potential AI work, you can do so by going to zero_087 and flagging the individual posts as "Does not meet the uploading guidelines" with this evidence attached.
Do not mass flag every single post from the artist, only the ones listed with concrete evidence on the thread.
what about the post that has evidence that they can draw in the comments
https://e621.net/posts/5497069?q=zero_087
fliphook said:
what about the post that has evidence that they can draw in the comments
https://e621.net/posts/5497069?q=zero_087
the twitter thread mentions that their timelapses may be falsified.
idk enough about this artist to say anything though.
manitka said:
the twitter thread mentions that their timelapses may be falsified.idk enough about this artist to say anything though.
they are questioning how can someone draw like this so quickly but zero could just really know their tools to get it done faster than others
that one fireman post does look a bit off but I dunno, I don't have much in the knowledge of looking at the digital side of the image
thegreatwolfgang said:
If you want to make a report for potential AI work, you can do so by going to zero_087 and flagging the individual posts as "Does not meet the uploading guidelines" with this evidence attached.
Do not mass flag every single post from the artist, only the ones listed with concrete evidence on the thread.
Or you can put all relevant posts in a set, and report the set.
kyiiel said:
Or you can put all relevant posts in a set, and report the set.
That is probably not how the set reporting system is supposed to be used.
If a lot of posts from an artist is involved, then it would be simpler to just report one post and then mention all relevant posts in the report as well.