Implicating huge_insertion -> big_penis.

Reason:

The problem here is that huge_insertion could mean insertion with any large object, not a penis per se. big_penis just means big penis; there may be no insertion involved.

Yeah, no. An insertion isn't always a penis. Let's leave implications to people who know what they're doing.

ExplosiveBlaziken said:
Yeah, no. An insertion isn't always a penis. Let's leave implications to people who know what they're doing.

megatroll

Gayteensex said:
megatroll

nope

Gayteensex said:
megatroll

Because telling you you're wrong is trolling, amiritegais?

ExplosiveBlaziken said:
Yeah, no. An insertion isn't always a penis. Let's leave implications to people who know what they're doing.

i have to side with blaze on this one

huge insertion could be a large dildo or other sex toy, or it could be a cheese grater.

http://e621.net/post/show/6268

cookiekangaroo said:
huge insertion could be a large dildo or other sex toy, or it could be a cheese grater.

http://e621.net/post/show/6268

Oh murr~

Question: Why do we still have huge_insertion as a tag? It would make no sense to anyone who hasn't seen it before. Plus the grammar is terrible.

Riversyde said:
Question: Why do we still have huge_insertion as a tag? It would make no sense to anyone who hasn't seen it before. Plus the grammar is terrible.

Say the word and I'll see that it meets with an unfortunate "incident."

ippiki_ookami said:
Say the word and I'll see that it meets with an unfortunate "incident."

Just edit the huge/large/whatever size insertion pics to what kind of insertion they are, like vaginal, anal or any other hole a furry has.

In other news, the vaginal_insertion -> vaginal_penetration alias is gone.

So insertion is for objects and penetration is for penii, correct?

yesh